Robert Gaschler

61 papers receiving 504 citations

Peers

Robert Gaschler
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • General Decision Sciences 18
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 109
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 163
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 106
  • Computational Mathematics 4
Replace Philippe Chassy with:
Philippe Chassy United Kingdom
Alessia Rosi Italy
Diego A. Reinero United States
Joel Suss United States
Fernando P. Ponce Chile
Dayna R. Touron United States
James A. Kole United States
Torstein Låg Norway
Anita Heijltjes Netherlands
Allegra Cattani United Kingdom
Robert Gaschler relative to Philippe Chassy United Kingdom Philippe Chassy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Philippe Chassy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Gaschler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Gaschler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Gaschler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Gaschler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Gaschler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Gaschler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Gaschler. The network helps show where Robert Gaschler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Gaschler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Gaschler Line = papers co-authored together Robert Gaschler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201986
2 201928
3 202125
4 202024
5 201722
6 201719
7 201916
8 201816
9 201115
10 200715
11 201215
12 202015
13 202114
14 202114
15 201613
16 202113
17 202013
18 202112
19 20209
20 20169

About Robert Gaschler

Robert Gaschler is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 68 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (16 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (10 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (8 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (8 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (7 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (7 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (7 papers) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (18 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (109 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (163 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (106 citations) and Computational Mathematics (4 citations). Robert Gaschler has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Helen Landmann, Anette Rohmann, Peter A. Frensch, Hilde Haider, Olga Tymofiyeva, Veit Kubik, Nicolas W. Schuck, Wolfgang Schnotz, Uwe Hamsen and Christian Waydhas. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Psychological Research, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Acta Psychologica and Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact