Thomas S. Huddle

707 total citations
35 papers, 441 citations indexed

About

Thomas S. Huddle is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas S. Huddle has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 441 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 16 papers in General Health Professions and 6 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Thomas S. Huddle's work include Innovations in Medical Education (10 papers), Ethics in medical practice (8 papers) and Healthcare cost, quality, practices (5 papers). Thomas S. Huddle is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (10 papers), Ethics in medical practice (8 papers) and Healthcare cost, quality, practices (5 papers). Thomas S. Huddle collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Thomas S. Huddle's co-authors include Gustavo R. Heudebert, F. Amos Bailey, Robert M. Centor, Jack Ende, Dan J. Stein, Derek Bolton, Damiaan Denys, Tia Powell, Stefan G. Kertesz and Michael Schwartz and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, The American Journal of Medicine and Journal of General Internal Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Thomas S. Huddle

30 papers receiving 417 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas S. Huddle United States	10	276	189	84	59	42	35	441
Charles L. Bardes United States	11	328 1.2×	177 0.9×	102 1.2×	151 2.6×	53 1.3×	17	545
Lekshmi Santhosh United States	13	220 0.8×	99 0.5×	64 0.8×	37 0.6×	44 1.0×	59	530
Donna M. Howard United States	7	368 1.3×	167 0.9×	129 1.5×	105 1.8×	43 1.0×	9	480
Cynthia H. Ledford United States	10	244 0.9×	130 0.7×	97 1.2×	30 0.5×	44 1.0×	20	415
Shou Ling Leong United States	12	289 1.0×	208 1.1×	45 0.5×	26 0.4×	38 0.9×	31	529
Heather Harrell United States	15	458 1.7×	218 1.2×	184 2.2×	104 1.8×	74 1.8×	31	639
Jennifer Stojan United States	10	298 1.1×	107 0.6×	181 2.2×	54 0.9×	74 1.8×	27	513
Danielle Saucier Canada	11	204 0.7×	216 1.1×	51 0.6×	20 0.3×	21 0.5×	25	355
Kerri Palamara United States	12	329 1.2×	193 1.0×	44 0.5×	18 0.3×	58 1.4×	34	536
Karen J. Connell United States	12	306 1.1×	135 0.7×	240 2.9×	87 1.5×	74 1.8×	20	614

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas S. Huddle

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas S. Huddle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas S. Huddle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas S. Huddle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas S. Huddle

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas S. Huddle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas S. Huddle. The network helps show where Thomas S. Huddle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas S. Huddle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas S. Huddle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas S. Huddle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas S. Huddle. Thomas S. Huddle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Grace, Andrew A., Richard N. Fogoros, Thomas S. Huddle, et al.. (2023). Patient safety advisory boards and risk evaluation. Heart Rhythm. 20(8). 1195–1196. 2 indexed citations

Huddle, Thomas S.. (2022). Against the Turn to Critical Race Theory and “Anti-racism” in Academic Medicine. HEC Forum. 35(4). 337–356.

Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani, Lois Snyder Sulmasy, Wylie Burke, et al.. (2022). Ethical Considerations in Precision Medicine and Genetic Testing in Internal Medicine Practice: A Position Paper From the American College of Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine. 175(9). 1322–1323. 17 indexed citations

Centor, Robert M. & Thomas S. Huddle. (2021). Should the risk of Fusobacterium necrophorum pharyngotonsillitis influence prescribing empiric antibiotics for sore throats in adolescents and young adults?. Anaerobe. 71. 102388–102388.

Huddle, Thomas S.. (2017). What does the character of medicine as a social practice imply for professional conscientious objection?. Metamedicine. 38(6). 429–445. 1 indexed citations

Huddle, Thomas S., et al.. (2014). Health Care Institutions Should Not Exclude Smokers From Employment. Academic Medicine. 89(6). 843–847. 5 indexed citations

Huddle, Thomas S.. (2013). The Limits of Social Justice as an Aspect of Medical Professionalism. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 38(4). 369–387. 9 indexed citations

Huddle, Thomas S.. (2012). Regarding Physician Advocacy. Academic Medicine. 87(2). 132–132. 1 indexed citations

Huddle, Thomas S. & F. Amos Bailey. (2012). Pacemaker deactivation: withdrawal of support or active ending of life?. Metamedicine. 33(6). 421–433. 18 indexed citations

10.

Huddle, Thomas S.. (2012). MORAL FICTION OR MORAL FACT? THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN DOING AND ALLOWING IN MEDICAL ETHICS. Bioethics. 27(5). 257–262. 3 indexed citations

11.

Huddle, Thomas S.. (2011). Perspective: Medical Professionalism and Medical Education Should Not Involve Commitments to Political Advocacy. Academic Medicine. 86(3). 378–383. 72 indexed citations

12.

Huddle, Thomas S.. (2011). Do Medical Professionalism and Medical Education Involve Commitments to Political Advocacy?. Academic Medicine. 86(9). 1065–1065. 2 indexed citations

13.

Huddle, Thomas S.. (2008). Drug Reps and the Academic Medical Center: a case for management rather than prohibition. Perspectives in biology and medicine. 51(2). 251–260. 11 indexed citations

14.

Huddle, Thomas S. & Gustavo R. Heudebert. (2008). Internal Medicine Training in the 21st Century. Academic Medicine. 83(10). 910–915. 29 indexed citations

15.

Huddle, Thomas S. & Gustavo R. Heudebert. (2007). Viewpoint: Taking Apart the Art: The Risk of Anatomizing Clinical Competence. Academic Medicine. 82(6). 536–541. 94 indexed citations

16.

Huddle, Thomas S.. (2007). The limits of objective assessment of medical practice. Metamedicine. 28(6). 487–496. 4 indexed citations

17.

Stein, Dan J., Derek Bolton, Damiaan Denys, Thomas S. Huddle, & Tia Powell. (2006). Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine: expanding the open-access conversation on health care.. Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine. 1(1). 1–1. 13 indexed citations

18.

Huddle, Thomas S.. (2005). Viewpoint:. Academic Medicine. 80(10). 885–891. 102 indexed citations

19.

Huddle, Thomas S., Robert M. Centor, & Gustavo R. Heudebert. (2003). American internal medicine in the 21st century. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 18(9). 764–767. 12 indexed citations

20.

Huddle, Thomas S.. (1996). Competition and Reform at the Medical Department of the University of Pennsylvania, 1847-1877. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences. 51(3). 251–292.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact