Metamedicine

1.1k papers and 12.3k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Metamedicine in the last decades have received a total of 12.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Metamedicine usually cover General Health Professions (480 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (292 papers) and Philosophy (248 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics in medical practice (367 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (195 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (181 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Metamedicine are Douglas S. Diekema, Daniel P. Sulmasy, S. Kay Toombs, Havi Carel, Fredrik Svenaeus, Albert R. Jonsen, Drew Leder, Edmund D. Pellegrino, Dan W. Brock and Kenneth Kipnis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Metamedicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Metamedicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Metamedicine.

Countries where authors publish in Metamedicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Metamedicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Metamedicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Metamedicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026