Thomas Park

598 citations
20 papers · 287 · h-index 9

Impact in

    • Teaching and Learning Programming
    • Online Learning and Analytics
    • Open Source Software Innovations
  • Software top 10%
    • Spreadsheets and End-User Computing

Papers in

Thomas Park

20 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

Thomas Park
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Computer Science Applications 119
  • Software 47
  • Human-Computer Interaction 40
  • Communication 42
  • Information Systems 75
Replace César França with:
César França Brazil
Cheryl Seals United States
Eloy D. Villasclaras-Fernández Spain
Mariano Pimentel Brazil
Michael Rees Australia
Charles Wallace United States
Christelle Scharff United States
Jill Cao United States
Vidya Rajaram United States
Sandeep Kaur Kuttal United States
Thomas Park relative to César França Brazil César França's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
César França · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Park

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Park's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Park with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Park more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Park

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Park. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Park. The network helps show where Thomas Park may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Park, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Park Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Park links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201169
2 201045
3 198638
4 201125
5 201519
6 201416
7 202116
8 201316
9 20069
10 20177
11 20136
12 20165
13 20134
14 20104
15 20153
16 20201
17 20151
18
Nugae Antiquae: Being a Miscellaneous Collection of Original Papers, in Prose and Verse
20091
19 20191
20 20101

About Thomas Park

Thomas Park is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Information Systems, Software, Communication and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (6 papers), Software Engineering Research (5 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (4 papers), Spreadsheets and End-User Computing (3 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (3 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (3 papers), Wikis in Education and Collaboration (2 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (119 citations), Software (47 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (40 citations), Communication (42 citations) and Information Systems (75 citations). Thomas Park has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Susan Wiedenbeck, Andrea Forte, Jill Cao, Margaret Burnett, Scott Fleming, Kyle Rector, Laura Beckwith, Valentina Grigoreanu, Brian Dorn and Ken H. Tachiki. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Biochemistry, Interacting with Computers, ACM Transactions on Computing Education, Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved and South African Journal of Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact