Cheryl Seals

536 citations
56 papers · 257 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Cheryl Seals

45 papers receiving 234 citations

Peers

Cheryl Seals
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Computer Science Applications 51
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 7
  • Human-Computer Interaction 27
  • Information Systems and Management 28
  • Software 13
Replace Charles Wallace with:
Charles Wallace United States
Ian Arawjo United States
Bimlesh Wadhwa Singapore
Thomas Mahatody Madagascar
Luciana Cardoso de Castro Salgado Brazil
Theodora Koulouri United Kingdom
Alex Kass United States
Bruno Gadelha Brazil
Mariano Pimentel Brazil
Samantha Thelijjagoda Sri Lanka
Cheryl Seals relative to Charles Wallace United States Charles Wallace's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Charles Wallace · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl Seals

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Seals's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Seals with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Seals more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl Seals

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Seals. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Seals. The network helps show where Cheryl Seals may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cheryl Seals, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheryl Seals Line = papers co-authored together Cheryl Seals links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199933
2 200832
3 200115
4 202515
5 202213
6 200312
7 200212
8 201611
9 202510
10 20227
11 20237
12 20087
13 20246
14 20066
15 20115
16
Clustering for usability participant selection
20075
17 20215
18 20234
19 20234
20 20224

About Cheryl Seals

Cheryl Seals is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Computer Science Applications, Information Systems and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 56 papers that have together received 257 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational Games and Gamification (10 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (10 papers), Topic Modeling (7 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers), Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining (6 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (5 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (5 papers) and Online Learning and Analytics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (51 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (7 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (27 citations), Information Systems and Management (28 citations) and Software (13 citations). Cheryl Seals has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Mary Beth Rosson, Edward A. Fox, John M. Carroll, Gerry Dozier, Juan E. Gilbert, Amit Das, Tracy L. Lewis, Zheng Zhang, Xuechao Li and Ángela I. Calderón. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Access, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, Food Chemistry, Journal of African American Studies and International Journal on Digital Libraries.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact