Kyle Rector
- Human-Computer Interaction top 1%
- Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts 5
- Interactive and Immersive Displays 4
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 4
- Software top 5%
- Spreadsheets and End-User Computing 7
- Human Factors and Ergonomics top 5%
- Information Systems top 2%
- Software Engineering Research 3
-
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions 13
-
- Educational Games and Gamification 7
-
- Human-Automation Interaction and Safety 4
- Co-authors
- Margaret BurnettMagdalena BałazińskaEvan WelbourneK. Lance GouldLeilani BattleJulie A. KientzRichard E. LadnerRachel Bellamy
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Kyle Rector
39 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Human-Computer Interaction 342
- Computer Science Applications 221
- Software 121
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 45
- Information Systems 374
Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Rector
This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Rector's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Rector with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Rector more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Rector
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Rector. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Rector. The network helps show where Kyle Rector may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Rector, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 54 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 42 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 43 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 69 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 45 | |
| 18 | Building the Internet of Things Using RFID: The RFID Ecosystem Experiencebreakdown → | 2009 | 461 |
| 19 | Females' and males' end-user debugging strategies : a sensemaking perspective | 2009 | 2 |
| 20 | 2008 | 8 |
About Kyle Rector
Kyle Rector is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Software and Computer Science Applications, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tactile and Sensory Interactions (13 papers), Spreadsheets and End-User Computing (7 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (7 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (5 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (4 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (4 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (4 papers) and Software Engineering Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (342 citations), Computer Science Applications (221 citations) and Software (121 citations). Kyle Rector has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Burnett, Magdalena Bałazińska, Evan Welbourne, K. Lance Gould, Leilani Battle, Julie A. Kientz, Richard E. Ladner, Rachel Bellamy, Cynthia L. Bennett and Joseph Lawrance. Their work appears in journals such as interactions, IEEE Internet Computing, IEEE Pervasive Computing, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society and Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.