Theo van Kempen
- Animal Science and Zoology top 2%
- Process Chemistry and Technology top 5%
- Small Animals top 5%
- Ecology
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Alberto Navarro‐VillaM. T. YokoyamaN. L. TrottierH.M.J. van HeesP. LangendijkT.T. CanhZ. MrozA.W. Jongbloed
- Topics
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology (8 papers)Meat and Animal Product Quality (7 papers)Odor and Emission Control Technologies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsSpain
In The Last Decade
Theo van Kempen
22 papers receiving 418 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Animal Science and Zoology 308
- Process Chemistry and Technology 99
- Small Animals 78
- Ecology 57
- Molecular Biology 52
Countries citing papers authored by Theo van Kempen
This map shows the geographic impact of Theo van Kempen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theo van Kempen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theo van Kempen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Theo van Kempen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Theo van Kempen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Theo van Kempen. The network helps show where Theo van Kempen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Theo van Kempen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Theo van Kempen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Theo van Kempen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Theo van Kempen. Theo van Kempen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 68 | |
| 3 | 44 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | In vitro characterization of starch digestion and its implications for pigs. | 22 |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 81 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 73 | |
| 18 | Objective measurement of odors using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and instrumental technologies. | 2 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Theo van Kempen
Theo van Kempen is a scholar working on Process Chemistry and Technology, Animal Science and Zoology and Small Animals, having authored 23 papers that have together received 458 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (8 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (7 papers) and Odor and Emission Control Technologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (99 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (308 citations) and Small Animals (78 citations). Theo van Kempen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Alberto Navarro‐Villa, M. T. Yokoyama, N. L. Trottier, H.M.J. van Hees, P. Langendijk, T.T. Canh, Z. Mroz, A.W. Jongbloed, K. Vreman and Adam J. Moeser. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture and Poultry Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.