Teresita McCarty

741 total citations
31 papers, 562 citations indexed

About

Teresita McCarty is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Teresita McCarty has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 562 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 11 papers in General Health Professions and 11 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Teresita McCarty's work include Ethics in medical practice (9 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers) and Radiology practices and education (4 papers). Teresita McCarty is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in medical practice (9 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers) and Radiology practices and education (4 papers). Teresita McCarty collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Spain. Teresita McCarty's co-authors include Laura Weiss Roberts, Michael Hollifield, Jay Parkes, Teddy D. Warner, Milton Rosenbaum, S S Obenshain, Jean Goodwin, Brian B. Roberts, Betty Skipper and E. H. Uhlenhuth and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of Immunology and American Journal of Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Teresita McCarty

30 papers receiving 529 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Teresita McCarty United States 15 247 207 198 91 75 31 562
Jennifer G. Christner United States 12 285 1.2× 41 0.2× 211 1.1× 61 0.7× 82 1.1× 34 613
Lana Al‐Nusair United Kingdom 3 220 0.9× 191 0.9× 77 0.4× 44 0.5× 178 2.4× 6 557
Ruth Allen United States 10 181 0.7× 62 0.3× 104 0.5× 73 0.8× 70 0.9× 26 443
A. Desmond Poole Australia 13 212 0.9× 97 0.5× 285 1.4× 81 0.9× 19 0.3× 22 581
Agnes Diemers Netherlands 11 385 1.6× 39 0.2× 160 0.8× 139 1.5× 180 2.4× 25 609
D. Daniel Hunt United States 13 493 2.0× 69 0.3× 277 1.4× 98 1.1× 48 0.6× 40 744
Hazen P. Ham United States 8 107 0.4× 137 0.7× 135 0.7× 36 0.4× 43 0.6× 19 361
Sebastian C. K. Shaw United Kingdom 13 161 0.7× 299 1.4× 137 0.7× 15 0.2× 69 0.9× 40 673
Matthew Russell United States 12 98 0.4× 63 0.3× 87 0.4× 28 0.3× 17 0.2× 27 593

Countries citing papers authored by Teresita McCarty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Teresita McCarty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Teresita McCarty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teresita McCarty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Teresita McCarty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Teresita McCarty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Teresita McCarty. The network helps show where Teresita McCarty may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Teresita McCarty

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Teresita McCarty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Teresita McCarty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Teresita McCarty. Teresita McCarty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Crandall, Cameron, et al.. (2014). A Medical/Legal Teaching and Assessment Collaboration on Domestic Violence: Assessment Using Standardized Patients/Standardized Clients. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 14. 61–61. 1 indexed citations
2.
Parkes, Jay, et al.. (2012). Feedback sandwiches affect perceptions but not performance. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 18(3). 397–407. 52 indexed citations
3.
Williams, Reed G., Debra L. Klamen, Christopher B. White, et al.. (2011). Tracking Development of Clinical Reasoning Ability Across Five Medical Schools Using a Progress Test. Academic Medicine. 86(9). 1148–1154. 38 indexed citations
4.
Crandall, Cameron, et al.. (2008). Assessment of a Cross‐Disciplinary Domestic Violence Training for Emergency Medicine Residents and Law Students. Academic Emergency Medicine. 15(s1). 1 indexed citations
5.
Berg, Benjamin W., et al.. (2007). Standardized patient interviewing with remote interactive technologies. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 13(3_suppl). 14–17. 6 indexed citations
6.
McCarty, Teresita, et al.. (2005). Improved Patient Notes from Medical Students during Web-Based Teaching Using Faculty-Calibrated Peer Review and Self-Assessment. Academic Medicine. 80(Supplement). S67–S70. 35 indexed citations
7.
Roberts, Laura Weiss, Cynthia Geppert, Teresita McCarty, & S S Obenshain. (2003). Evaluating medical students’ skills in obtaining informed consent for HIV testing. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 18(2). 112–119. 17 indexed citations
8.
Rosenbaum, Milton & Teresita McCarty. (2002). Alcohol prescription by surgeons in the prevention and treatment of delirium tremens: historic and current practice. General Hospital Psychiatry. 24(4). 257–259. 13 indexed citations
9.
Uhlenhuth, E. H., Vladan Starčević, Teddy D. Warner, et al.. (2002). A general anxiety-prone cognitive style in anxiety disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders. 70(3). 241–249. 17 indexed citations
10.
Warner, Teddy D., Laura Weiss Roberts, Brian Roberts, et al.. (2001). Uncertainty and Opposition of Medical Students Toward Assisted Death Practices. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 22(2). 657–667. 18 indexed citations
11.
Roberts, Laura Weiss, Teresita McCarty, & S S Obenshain. (1999). Comprehensive performance examination gives insights into the “hidden curriculum”. Academic Medicine. 74(5). 597–8. 7 indexed citations
12.
Uhlenhuth, E. H., Teresita McCarty, Susan Paine, & Teddy D. Warner. (1999). The revised Anxious Thoughts and Tendencies (AT&T) scale: a general measure of anxiety-prone cognitive style. Journal of Affective Disorders. 52(1-3). 51–58. 15 indexed citations
13.
Roberts, Laura Weiss, et al.. (1999). Honorary Fellowship Awards and Professional Development in Psychiatry. Academic Psychiatry. 23(4). 210–221. 3 indexed citations
14.
Roberts, Laura Weiss, et al.. (1999). Assessing medical students’ competence in obtaining informed consent. The American Journal of Surgery. 178(4). 351–354. 12 indexed citations
15.
Roberts, Laura Weiss, Teresita McCarty, Constantine G. Lyketsos, et al.. (1996). What and How Psychiatry Residents at Ten Training Programs Wish to Learn About Ethics. Academic Psychiatry. 20(3). 131–143. 33 indexed citations
16.
Roberts, Laura Weiss, et al.. (1996). Clinical Ethics Teaching in Psychiatric Supervision. Academic Psychiatry. 20(3). 176–188. 15 indexed citations
17.
18.
Roberts, Laura Weiss, et al.. (1995). Should competent patients or their families be able to refuse to allow an HEC case review?. HEC Forum. 7(1). 48–50. 1 indexed citations
19.
Rosenbaum, Milton & Teresita McCarty. (1994). The Relationship of Psychosomatic Medicine to Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. Psychosomatics. 35(6). 569–573. 7 indexed citations
20.
Goodwin, Jean, et al.. (1988). Reporting by Adult Psychiatric Patients of Childhood Sexual Abuse. American Journal of Psychiatry. 145(9). 1183–a. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026