Julia M. Smith

646 total citations
7 papers, 516 citations indexed

About

Julia M. Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia M. Smith has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 516 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 2 papers in Health and 2 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Julia M. Smith's work include Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (1 paper). Julia M. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (1 paper). Julia M. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Canada. Julia M. Smith's co-authors include Vonnie C. McLoyd, James O. Woolliscroft, Judith G. Calhoun, Jonathan A. Finkelstein, Sandra L. Hofferth, Allon Vishkin, Michael H. Pasek, Jeremy Ginges, Azim Shariff and Cindel White and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Science, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

In The Last Decade

Julia M. Smith

7 papers receiving 469 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Julia M. Smith United States	6	253	154	152	115	86	7	516
A. Hallam United Kingdom	8	269 1.1×	86 0.6×	222 1.5×	35 0.3×	39 0.5×	13	563
Lara Ayala‐Nunes Portugal	14	289 1.1×	70 0.5×	63 0.4×	109 0.9×	105 1.2×	47	436
Ellen Katz Canada	11	145 0.6×	92 0.6×	61 0.4×	52 0.5×	91 1.1×	29	558
Francesco Sulla Italy	12	169 0.7×	94 0.6×	67 0.4×	78 0.7×	111 1.3×	32	441
Terese Glatz Sweden	14	322 1.3×	219 1.4×	70 0.5×	157 1.4×	117 1.4×	36	500
Haleigh Scott United States	10	216 0.9×	40 0.3×	254 1.7×	44 0.4×	21 0.2×	15	493
Khalid Karim United Kingdom	15	451 1.8×	93 0.6×	50 0.3×	150 1.3×	86 1.0×	30	645
Raghu Raghavan United Kingdom	14	245 1.0×	66 0.4×	114 0.8×	80 0.7×	42 0.5×	49	457
W.M.W.J. van Oorsouw Netherlands	11	173 0.7×	64 0.4×	119 0.8×	48 0.4×	25 0.3×	23	382
Rebecca Anthony United Kingdom	13	275 1.1×	110 0.7×	57 0.4×	88 0.8×	68 0.8×	38	479

Countries citing papers authored by Julia M. Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia M. Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia M. Smith. The network helps show where Julia M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia M. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia M. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia M. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia M. Smith. Julia M. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Smith, Julia M., et al.. (2024). The Privileges We Do and Do Not See: The Relative Salience of Interpersonal and Circumstantial Benefits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 51(11). 2217–2230. 2 indexed citations

2.

Pasek, Michael H., John Kelly, Cindel White, et al.. (2023). Thinking About God Encourages Prosociality Toward Religious Outgroups: A Cross-Cultural Investigation. Psychological Science. 34(6). 657–669. 15 indexed citations

3.

Smith, Julia M., et al.. (2022). Thinking about God discourages dehumanization of religious outgroups.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 151(10). 2586–2603. 11 indexed citations

4.

Pasek, Michael H., et al.. (2020). God Values the Lives of My Out-Group More Than I Do: Evidence From Fiji and Israel. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 11(7). 1032–1041. 16 indexed citations

5.

McLoyd, Vonnie C. & Julia M. Smith. (2002). Physical Discipline and Behavior Problems in African American, European American, and Hispanic Children: Emotional Support as a Moderator. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 64(1). 40–53. 281 indexed citations

6.

Hofferth, Sandra L., Julia M. Smith, Vonnie C. McLoyd, & Jonathan A. Finkelstein. (2000). Achievement and Behavior Among Children of Welfare Recipients, Welfare Leavers, and Low‐Income Single Mothers. Journal of Social Issues. 56(4). 747–774. 37 indexed citations

7.

Woolliscroft, James O., et al.. (1993). Medical studentsʼ clinical self-assessments. Academic Medicine. 68(4). 285–94. 154 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact