International Labour Review

968 papers and 13.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 968 papers published in International Labour Review in the last decades have received a total of 13.1k indexed citations. Papers published in International Labour Review usually cover General Health Professions (304 papers), Political Science and International Relations (284 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (242 papers) specifically the topics of Employment and Welfare Studies (288 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (238 papers) and Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (143 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Labour Review are Richard Anker, David Kučera, Stephanie Barrientos, W. Edward Steinmueller, Dharam Ghai, Arianna Rossi, Gary Gereffi, Joseph E. Stiglitz, Martín Carnoy and David Zweig.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Labour Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Labour Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Labour Review.

Countries where authors publish in International Labour Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Labour Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Labour Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Labour Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025