Tamjid Mujtaba

1.3k total citations
37 papers, 728 citations indexed

About

Tamjid Mujtaba is a scholar working on Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Tamjid Mujtaba has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 728 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Education, 15 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 14 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Tamjid Mujtaba's work include Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (15 papers), Career Development and Diversity (12 papers) and Science Education and Pedagogy (11 papers). Tamjid Mujtaba is often cited by papers focused on Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (15 papers), Career Development and Diversity (12 papers) and Science Education and Pedagogy (11 papers). Tamjid Mujtaba collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Mexico. Tamjid Mujtaba's co-authors include Michael Reiß, Richard Sheldrake, Mary Oliver, Martin Lawrence, Shirley Simon, Adrian Furnham, Melissa Rodd, Ruth Lupton, Leon Feinstein and Pam Sammons and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Science Education, British Educational Research Journal and International Journal of Educational Research.

In The Last Decade

Tamjid Mujtaba

36 papers receiving 679 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tamjid Mujtaba United Kingdom 17 426 197 182 163 128 37 728
Becky Wai‐Ling Packard United States 17 565 1.3× 389 2.0× 110 0.6× 129 0.8× 326 2.5× 49 925
Karen Jones United Kingdom 7 595 1.4× 103 0.5× 99 0.5× 192 1.2× 117 0.9× 15 812
Lars Ulriksen Denmark 14 497 1.2× 166 0.8× 105 0.6× 138 0.8× 96 0.8× 34 755
Patrick Barmby United Kingdom 13 537 1.3× 82 0.4× 101 0.6× 224 1.4× 92 0.7× 21 732
Nicole M. Joseph United States 13 512 1.2× 173 0.9× 72 0.4× 38 0.2× 117 0.9× 26 779
Wendy Nielsen Australia 18 823 1.9× 46 0.2× 106 0.6× 297 1.8× 118 0.9× 67 1.2k
Felicia Moore Mensah United States 19 825 1.9× 233 1.2× 57 0.3× 163 1.0× 95 0.7× 46 1.1k
Tony Pell United Kingdom 12 720 1.7× 49 0.2× 65 0.4× 239 1.5× 102 0.8× 16 846
James Reed Campbell United States 15 398 0.9× 87 0.4× 266 1.5× 83 0.5× 146 1.1× 59 702
Brian E. Woolnough United Kingdom 18 783 1.8× 101 0.5× 84 0.5× 365 2.2× 122 1.0× 55 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Tamjid Mujtaba

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tamjid Mujtaba's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tamjid Mujtaba with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tamjid Mujtaba more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tamjid Mujtaba

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tamjid Mujtaba. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tamjid Mujtaba. The network helps show where Tamjid Mujtaba may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tamjid Mujtaba

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tamjid Mujtaba. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tamjid Mujtaba based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tamjid Mujtaba. Tamjid Mujtaba is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mujtaba, Tamjid, et al.. (2024). Reviewing the role of the physics curriculum and its assessment in post-16 gender disparities. International Journal of Science Education. 47(15-16). 2045–2070. 1 indexed citations
2.
Reiß, Michael, et al.. (2020). Students’ Perceptions of Religion and Science, and How They Relate: the Effects of a Classroom Intervention. Religious Education. 115(3). 349–363. 6 indexed citations
3.
Mujtaba, Tamjid, Martin Lawrence, Mary Oliver, & Michael Reiß. (2018). Learning and engagement through natural history museums. Studies in Science Education. 54(1). 41–67. 73 indexed citations
4.
Mujtaba, Tamjid, Richard Sheldrake, Michael Reiß, & Shirley Simon. (2018). Students’ science attitudes, beliefs, and context: associations with science and chemistry aspirations. International Journal of Science Education. 40(6). 644–667. 59 indexed citations
5.
Mujtaba, Tamjid, Sue Dale Tunnicliffe, & Richard Sheldrake. (2017). Teachers’ perceptions of Inquiry-Based Science Education (IBSE) and the implications for gender equality in science education. UCL Discovery (University College London). 1 indexed citations
6.
Mujtaba, Tamjid, et al.. (2017). Epistemic insight: Teaching about science and RE in secondary schools. School science review. 99(367). 67–75. 3 indexed citations
7.
Sheldrake, Richard, Tamjid Mujtaba, & Michael Reiß. (2017). Students’ Changing Attitudes and Aspirations Towards Physics During Secondary School. Research in Science Education. 49(6). 1809–1834. 32 indexed citations
8.
Mujtaba, Tamjid. (2016). Education in London: Challenges and opportunities for young people. London Review of Education. 14(2). 4 indexed citations
9.
Mujtaba, Tamjid & Michael Reiß. (2016). “I Fall Asleep in Class … But Physics Is Fascinating”: The Use of Large-Scale Longitudinal Data to Explore the Educational Experiences of Aspiring Girls in Mathematics and Physics. Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education. 16(4). 313–330. 16 indexed citations
11.
Mujtaba, Tamjid, Michael Reiß, & Ann Hodgson. (2014). Motivating and supporting young people to study mathematics: A London perspective. London Review of Education. 12(1). 6 indexed citations
12.
Sheldrake, Richard, Tamjid Mujtaba, & Michael Reiß. (2013). Calibration of self-evaluations of mathematical ability for students in England aged 13 and 15, and their intentions to study non-compulsory mathematics after age 16. International Journal of Educational Research. 64. 49–61. 24 indexed citations
13.
Mujtaba, Tamjid & Michael Reiß. (2013). Factors that lead to positive or negative stress in secondary school teachers of mathematics and science. Oxford Review of Education. 39(5). 627–648. 17 indexed citations
15.
Mujtaba, Tamjid & Michael Reiß. (2012). Gender differences in 15 year-olds’ perceptions of physics, physics lessons and physics teachers. IOE EPrints. 2 indexed citations
16.
Mujtaba, Tamjid & Michael Reiß. (2012). What Sort of Girl Wants to Study Physics After the Age of 16? Findings from a Large-scale UK Survey. International Journal of Science Education. 35(17). 2979–2998. 52 indexed citations
17.
Reiß, Michael, Celia Hoyles, Tamjid Mujtaba, et al.. (2011). UNDERSTANDING PARTICIPATION RATES IN POST-16 MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS: CONCEPTUALISING AND OPERATIONALISING THE UPMAP PROJECT. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 9(2). 273–302. 24 indexed citations
18.
Rodd, Melissa, Michael Reiß, & Tamjid Mujtaba. (2011). Undergraduates' stories about why they are studying physics: implications for policy. 1 indexed citations
19.
Rodd, Melissa, Tamjid Mujtaba, & Michael Reiß. (2010). Participation in mathematics post-18: Undergraduates' stories. IOE EPrints. 6 indexed citations
20.
Feinstein, Leon, et al.. (2008). The Public Value of Social Housing: a Longitudinal Analysis of the Relationship Between Housing and Life Chances. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026