Taly Reich
- General Decision Sciences top 2%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics 7
- Safety Research top 5%
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies 5
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 6
- Marketing top 10%
- Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification 3
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 8
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 5
- Digital Marketing and Social Media 3
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 2
Taly Reich
25 papers receiving 673 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- General Decision Sciences 125
- Safety Research 155
- Applied Psychology 71
- Marketing 103
- Cognitive Neuroscience 163
Countries citing papers authored by Taly Reich
This map shows the geographic impact of Taly Reich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Taly Reich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Taly Reich more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Taly Reich
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Taly Reich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Taly Reich. The network helps show where Taly Reich may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Taly Reich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 47 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 12 | When Feeling Good Feels “Wrong”: Avoiding Hedonic Consumption When It Reflects Immoral Character | 2017 | 1 |
| 13 | 2016 | 37 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 37 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 23 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 198 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 66 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 74 | |
| 20 | The tissue response to a plastic adhesive used in combination with microsurgical technique in reconstruction of small arteries. | 1966 | 20 |
About Taly Reich
Taly Reich is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 28 papers that have together received 732 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (3 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (125 citations), Safety Research (155 citations) and Applied Psychology (71 citations). Taly Reich has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and India. Frequent co-authors include Sam J. Maglio, Michael I. Norton, Ilyana Kuziemko, Ryan W. Buell, Stephanie Lin, Daniella Kupor, S. Christian Wheeler, Arnon Lotem, Sharoni Shafir and Ido Erev. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Journal of Marketing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.