Citations per year, relative to Stewart Adam Stewart Adam (= 1×)
peers
Surej P. John
Countries citing papers authored by Stewart Adam
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stewart Adam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stewart Adam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stewart Adam more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stewart Adam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stewart Adam. The network helps show where Stewart Adam may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stewart Adam
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stewart Adam.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stewart Adam based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stewart Adam. Stewart Adam is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Adam, Stewart, et al.. (2009). NFC, Moral Position, Socialisation, and Ethical Decision-Making. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 1–9.3 indexed citations
6.
Wilson, Bradley, et al.. (2008). Assessing indicant directionality of a media consumption construct using confirmatory tetrad analysis. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 1–8.
Adam, Stewart, et al.. (2007). Customer analytics and marketing research : antithesis and synthesis. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 180–187.1 indexed citations
9.
Adam, Stewart, et al.. (2005). Tropes in Advertising: A Web-Based Empirical Study. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University).1 indexed citations
10.
Adam, Stewart, et al.. (2004). Marketing readiness of websites and organisational performance in Australia and New Zealand: a discussion of pre-test findings. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 25–35.
11.
Adam, Stewart, et al.. (2004). Marketing research and its value: the experience of Australian organisations. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 12(1). 9–21.1 indexed citations
12.
Adam, Stewart, et al.. (2004). Response rates in telephone surveys: managing contactability. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 1–7.
13.
Adam, Stewart, et al.. (2002). An exploratory investigation of attitude toward the website and the advertising hierarchy of effects. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 620–631.21 indexed citations
14.
Shaw, Robin M., Stewart Adam, & Heath McDonald. (2002). ANZMAC 2002 : conference proceedings.2 indexed citations
15.
Adam, Stewart, et al.. (2002). Developing and testing a model of knowledge utilisation through marketing research. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 3361–3367.1 indexed citations
Adam, Stewart. (2001). One to one eMarketing strategy alignment: five internet case studies. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 2–20.2 indexed citations
18.
Adam, Stewart, et al.. (2001). Experiential dimensions in internet marketing : an exploratory investigation. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 1–7.2 indexed citations
19.
Adam, Stewart, Rajendra Mulye, Kenneth R. Deans, & Dayananda Palihawadana. (2001). A three country comparison of internet marketing. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 1–7.2 indexed citations
20.
Adam, Stewart & Kate Westberg. (1998). electronic.marketing@internet : marketing on the internet. Prentice Hall eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.