Sport Management Review

870 papers and 26.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 870 papers published in Sport Management Review in the last decades have received a total of 26.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Sport Management Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (660 papers), Gender Studies (514 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (199 papers) specifically the topics of Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (528 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (504 papers) and Sports Analytics and Performance (193 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sport Management Review are Daniel C. Funk, Heather Gibson, Pamela Wicker, David Shilbury, Nico Schulenkorf, Alison Doherty, Janet Fink, George B. Cunningham, Laura Burton and Graham Cuskelly.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Sport Management Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Sport Management Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sport Management Review.

Countries where authors publish in Sport Management Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sport Management Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sport Management Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sport Management Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025