Stephen Schiffer
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Philosophy top 0.1%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.2%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Language and Linguistics top 2%
- Co-authors
- Gilbert HarmanJerry A. FodorStewart CohenJohn HawthorneElizabeth HarmanJames PryorTimothy WilliamsonJames E. Tomberlin
- Topics
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science (24 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (19 papers)Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandChina
In The Last Decade
Stephen Schiffer
59 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.1k
- Philosophy 1.0k
- History and Philosophy of Science 420
- Artificial Intelligence 325
- Language and Linguistics 262
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Schiffer
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Schiffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Schiffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Schiffer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Schiffer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Schiffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Schiffer. The network helps show where Stephen Schiffer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Schiffer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Schiffer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Schiffer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Schiffer. Stephen Schiffer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Gricean Semantics and Vague Speaker-Meaning | 1 |
| 4 | The Things We Mean | 1 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 189 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Remnants of Meaning | 213 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 42 |
About Stephen Schiffer
Stephen Schiffer is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (24 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (19 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (420 citations), Philosophy (1.0k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.1k citations). Stephen Schiffer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and China. Frequent co-authors include Gilbert Harman, Jerry A. Fodor, Stewart Cohen, John Hawthorne, Elizabeth Harman, James Pryor, Timothy Williamson, James E. Tomberlin, Huong Thi Thanh Nguyen and Brian Weatherson. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Addictive Behaviors and The Philosophical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.