Herman Cappelen
- Philosophy top 0.1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Language and Linguistics top 1%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Topics
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science (26 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (25 papers)Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorwayUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Herman Cappelen
59 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Philosophy 1.4k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.1k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 477
- Language and Linguistics 477
- History and Philosophy of Science 331
Countries citing papers authored by Herman Cappelen
This map shows the geographic impact of Herman Cappelen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herman Cappelen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herman Cappelen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Herman Cappelen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herman Cappelen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herman Cappelen. The network helps show where Herman Cappelen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Herman Cappelen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Herman Cappelen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Herman Cappelen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Herman Cappelen. Herman Cappelen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Conceptual Engineering: The Master Argument | 12 |
| 2 | Fixing Languagebreakdown → | 323 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 41 | |
| 6 | 62 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | Insensitive Semantics. A Defence of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism | 8 |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 33 | |
| 12 | 32 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | Reference externalized and the role of intuitions in semantic theory | 4 |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 74 |
About Herman Cappelen
Herman Cappelen is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 63 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (26 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (25 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (1.4k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.1k citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (331 citations). Herman Cappelen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Hawthorne, Ernest Lepore, Ernie Lepore, Josh Dever, Jessica Brown, David Plunkett and Max Deutsch. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Noûs and Synthese.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.