Brian Weatherson

3.6k citations
60 papers · 1.2k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Brian Weatherson

57 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Brian Weatherson
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Philosophy 941
  • History and Philosophy of Science 249
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 579
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 482
  • General Decision Sciences 39
Replace Roy Sorensen with:
Roy Sorensen United States
Laurence Bonjour United States
Daniel Nolan Australia
Adam Elga United States
Ernest Sosa United States
Richard Feldman United States
Michael Huemer United States
Hannes Leitgeb Germany
Alan Hájek Australia
Jonathan E. Adler United States
Brian Weatherson relative to Roy Sorensen United States Roy Sorensen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Roy Sorensen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Weatherson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Weatherson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Weatherson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Weatherson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Weatherson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Weatherson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Weatherson. The network helps show where Brian Weatherson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Brian Weatherson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Weatherson Line = papers co-authored together Brian Weatherson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005139
2 2003127
3
Moral uncertainty and its consequences
200071
4 201970
5 200869
6 201362
7
Morality, Fiction, and Possibility
200457
8 200745
9 200141
10 200841
11 200234
12 200434
13 200130
14 201128
15 200328
16 201325
17 201124
18 200522
19 200522
20 201422

About Brian Weatherson

Brian Weatherson is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (31 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (28 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (15 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (10 papers), Free Will and Agency (7 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers) and Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (941 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (249 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (579 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (482 citations) and General Decision Sciences (39 citations). Brian Weatherson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ishani Maitra, Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa, John Hawthorne, Andy Egan, James Pryor, Geoffrey Lee, Stephen Schiffer, R. N. Boyd, Stewart Cohen and Ralph Wedgwood. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, The Philosophical Quarterly, Analysis and Philosophical Perspectives.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact