James E. Tomberlin
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 5
- Philosophy, Science, and History 2
- Philosophy top 1%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 5
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 3
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 3
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 11
- Theoretical Computer Science top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Free Will and Agency 2
-
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 5
James E. Tomberlin
50 papers receiving 487 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- History and Philosophy of Science 126
- Philosophy 264
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 246
- Theoretical Computer Science 15
- Cognitive Neuroscience 141
Countries citing papers authored by James E. Tomberlin
This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Tomberlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Tomberlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Tomberlin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Tomberlin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Tomberlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Tomberlin. The network helps show where James E. Tomberlin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Tomberlin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 2 | Mind, causation, and world, 1997 | 1997 | 3 |
| 3 | Language, mind, and ontology | 1997 | 5 |
| 4 | AI, connectionism and philosophical psychology, 1995 | 1995 | 9 |
| 5 | 1992 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 48 | |
| 9 | Action theory and philosophy of mind, 1990 | 1990 | 9 |
| 10 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 11 | Philosophy of mind and action theory, 1989 | 1989 | 7 |
| 12 | 1989 | 119 | |
| 13 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1988 | 13 | |
| 15 | 1988 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1986 | 35 | |
| 17 | 1985 | 16 | |
| 18 | 1977 | 2 | |
| 19 | Prior on Time and Tense | 1970 | 1 |
| 20 | 1970 | 1 |
About James E. Tomberlin
James E. Tomberlin is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Psychology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 58 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (11 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers) and Free Will and Agency (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (126 citations), Philosophy (264 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (246 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (15 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (141 citations). James E. Tomberlin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David Lewis, Myles Brand, Lennart Åqvist, Patrick Grim, Jaakko Hintikka, Nicholas Wolterstorff, Unto Remes, Alvin Plantinga, Héctor-Neri Castañeda and Peter van Inwagen. Their work appears in journals such as Noûs, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophical Issues, Philosophical Studies and Religious Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.