Fred Feldman
- Philosophy top 0.05%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 12
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 7
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 7
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 3
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 8
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 9
-
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction 4
-
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being 3
Fred Feldman
77 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Philosophy 1.8k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
- History and Philosophy of Science 188
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 531
- General Decision Sciences 48
Countries citing papers authored by Fred Feldman
This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Feldman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Feldman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Feldman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Feldman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Feldman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Feldman. The network helps show where Fred Feldman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Fred Feldman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 112 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 23 | |
| 6 | Living high and letting die: Our illusion of innocence | 1998 | 3 |
| 7 | Introduction to Ethics | 1998 | 1 |
| 8 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 46 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 44 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 96 | |
| 13 | 1990 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1989 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 16 | WITTGENSTEIN ON RULES AND PRIVATE LANGUAGE - AN ELEMENTARY EXPOSITION - KRIPKE,S | 1986 | 9 |
| 17 | 1983 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1982 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1973 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1973 | 4 |
About Fred Feldman
Fred Feldman is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and General Decision Sciences, having authored 83 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (12 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (9 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (7 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (4 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (3 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (1.8k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations), History and Philosophy of Science (188 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (531 citations) and General Decision Sciences (48 citations). Fred Feldman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include J. L. Mackie, John Martin Fischer, Peter Vallentyne, Alan Gewirth, Stephen E. Rosenbaum, Roy W. Perrett, Saul A. Kripke, Ernest Sosa, R. M. Hare and Lennart Åqvist. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Noûs, The Philosophical Review and Utilitas.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.