Nathan Salmón
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.2%
- Philosophy, Science, and History 6
- Philosophy and History of Science 3
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 32
- Philosophy top 0.1%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 8
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 5
- Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education 4
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 3
- Language and Linguistics top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 10
- Co-authors
- Scott SoamesPenelope MaddyGideon RosenWilliam G. LycanDavid K. LewisGraeme ForbesJohn BurgessMark Richard
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Nathan Salmón
58 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- History and Philosophy of Science 480
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.3k
- Philosophy 982
- Language and Linguistics 197
- Artificial Intelligence 398
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Salmón
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Salmón's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Salmón with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Salmón more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Salmón
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Salmón. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Salmón. The network helps show where Nathan Salmón may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Salmón, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 15 | |
| 10 | Metaphysics, Mathematics, and Meaning | 2008 | 1 |
| 11 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 13 | Externalism, naturalism, nominalism, and mathematics | 2001 | 25 |
| 14 | 1997 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 13 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 95 | |
| 18 | Propositions and attitudes | 1988 | 89 |
| 19 | 1986 | 37 | |
| 20 | 1979 | 2 |
About Nathan Salmón
Nathan Salmón is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Theoretical Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (32 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (10 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (6 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers) and Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (480 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.3k citations), Philosophy (982 citations), Language and Linguistics (197 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (398 citations). Nathan Salmón has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Scott Soames, Penelope Maddy, Gideon Rosen, William G. Lycan, David K. Lewis, Graeme Forbes, John Burgess, Mark Richard, Mark E. Steiner and Sydney Shoemaker. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Noûs, The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Philosophical Perspectives.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.