James Pryor

2.6k citations
12 papers · 1.1k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 8
Topics
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (9 papers)Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers)

In The Last Decade

James Pryor

11 papers receiving 905 citations

Hit Papers

The Skeptic and the Dogmatist20002026200820172000100200300400500

Peers

James Pryor
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Philosophy 955
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 701
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 450
  • History and Philosophy of Science 190
  • Sociology and Political Science 112
Replace Ram Neta with:
Ram Neta United States
Alan Millar United Kingdom
Anthony Brueckner United States
Clayton Littlejohn United Kingdom
Jane Friedman United States
Carl Ginet United States
Michael R. DePaul United States
Max Kölbel Spain
Stewart Cohen United States
Declan Smithies United States
James Pryor relative to Ram Neta United States Ram Neta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Ram Neta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Pryor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Pryor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Pryor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Pryor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Pryor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Pryor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Pryor. The network helps show where James Pryor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Pryor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Pryor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Pryor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Pryor. James Pryor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 14
2 18
3 22
4
Basic Justification and the Moorean Response to the Skeptic
21
5 2
6
More on Hyper-Reliability and A Priority *
1
7 3
8 7
9 259
10 146
11
The Skeptic and the Dogmatistbreakdown →
510
12 65

About James Pryor

James Pryor is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (9 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (955 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (701 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (190 citations). James Pryor has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and China. Frequent co-authors include Ram Neta, Stephen Schiffer, Declan Smithies, Louis deRosset, Elizabeth Harman, Ralph Wedgwood, Timothy Williamson, Stewart Cohen, Brian Weatherson and Geoffrey Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Noûs, Philosophical Studies and The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026