John Cottingham
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Historical Philosophy and Science 19
- History of Science and Medicine 7
- Philosophy top 0.2%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 19
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 16
- Karl Barth and Christian Theology 6
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 6
- General Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 7
-
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 5
John Cottingham
80 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- History and Philosophy of Science 309
- Philosophy 654
- General Psychology 29
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 145
- Cognitive Neuroscience 210
Countries citing papers authored by John Cottingham
This map shows the geographic impact of John Cottingham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Cottingham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Cottingham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Cottingham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Cottingham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Cottingham. The network helps show where John Cottingham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Cottingham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 32 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 17 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 45 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 16 | The Philosophical Writings of Descartes Vol. Iii: The Correspondence | 1991 | 34 |
| 17 | The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Volume 3, The Correspondence | 1991 | 43 |
| 18 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1981 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1978 | 61 |
About John Cottingham
John Cottingham is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Health, Religious studies and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 95 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (19 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (19 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (16 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (7 papers), History of Science and Medicine (7 papers), Karl Barth and Christian Theology (6 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (6 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (309 citations), Philosophy (654 citations), General Psychology (29 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (145 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (210 citations). John Cottingham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dugald Murdoch, Robert Stoothoff, Marcia Cavell, D. W. Hamlyn, G. A. J. Rogers, Anthony Kenny, Daniel Gärber, Paul F. Hoffman, John Carriero and P. M. S. Hacker. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophy, The Philosophical Review, European Journal for Philosophy of Religion and History of European Ideas.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.