Stephen Richer

20 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers

Stephen Richer
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Applied Psychology 47
  • Social Psychology 146
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 73
  • Safety Research 48
  • Education 121
Replace Laurent A. Daloz with:
Laurent A. Daloz United States
Daphne M. Keats Australia
Louis V. Paradise United States
Richard S. Sharf United States
Mike M. Milstein United States
Moshé Tatar Israel
Roger L. Gould United States
Thomas A. Kolditz United States
Paul R. Salomone United States
Michael W. Galbraith United States
Stephen Richer relative to Laurent A. Daloz United States Laurent A. Daloz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Laurent A. Daloz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Richer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Richer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Richer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Richer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Richer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Richer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Richer. The network helps show where Stephen Richer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Richer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Richer Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Richer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202136
2 20017
3
Construction et validation de l'échelle du sentiment d'appartenance sociale (ÉSAS)
1998137
4 199513
5 19923
6 19904
7 19904
8 19901
9 198810
10
Social Issues: Sociological Views of Canada
198211
11 19814
12 19793
13 197666
14 197513
15
Issues in Canadian society: An introduction to sociology
197511
16 19749
17 19743
18 197373
19 197120
20 196815

About Stephen Richer

Stephen Richer is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Health, Education, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions, having authored 22 papers that have together received 457 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include School Choice and Performance (4 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (3 papers), Education Systems and Policy (2 papers), Education, sociology, and vocational training (2 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers) and Community Health and Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (47 citations), Social Psychology (146 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (73 citations), Safety Research (48 citations) and Education (121 citations). Stephen Richer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Vallerand, Dennis Forcese, Ronald J. Miller, Vanessa Heaslip, Hüseyin Doğan, Bibha Simkhada, Sue Green, William M. Mason, Lorna Weir and Sue Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Sociology of Education, Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Journal of Marriage and the Family.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026