Vanessa Heaslip
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- Janet ScammellTeresa BurdettSarah HeanDebra JacksonDenise WilsonEdwin van TeijlingenPramod RegmiJonathan Parker
- Topics
- Homelessness and Social Issues (9 papers)Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (8 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONECochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNorwayAustralia
In The Last Decade
Vanessa Heaslip
82 papers receiving 828 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- General Health Professions 378
- Sociology and Political Science 205
- Clinical Psychology 153
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 136
- Education 97
Countries citing papers authored by Vanessa Heaslip
This map shows the geographic impact of Vanessa Heaslip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vanessa Heaslip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vanessa Heaslip more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vanessa Heaslip
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vanessa Heaslip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vanessa Heaslip. The network helps show where Vanessa Heaslip may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vanessa Heaslip
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vanessa Heaslip. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vanessa Heaslip based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Vanessa Heaslip. Vanessa Heaslip is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | The ETEMIC perspective: a new way of understanding vulnerability of a Gypsy/Travelling community | 1 |
| 16 | Humanising nursing care: a theoretical model. | 11 |
| 17 | Humanising values at the heart of nurse education. | 8 |
| 18 | Understanding vulnerability : a nursing and healthcare approach | 7 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 30 |
About Vanessa Heaslip
Vanessa Heaslip is a scholar working on Research and Theory, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 90 papers that have together received 879 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homelessness and Social Issues (9 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (8 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (62 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (24 citations) and General Health Professions (378 citations). Vanessa Heaslip has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Janet Scammell, Teresa Burdett, Sarah Hean, Debra Jackson, Denise Wilson, Edwin van Teijlingen, Pramod Regmi, Jonathan Parker, Tatek Abebe and Jaqui Hewitt‐Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.