Stephen Lipscomb

1.2k citations
48 papers · 732 indexed · h-index 14

Stephen Lipscomb

42 papers receiving 646 citations

Peers

Stephen Lipscomb
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Safety Research 171
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 36
  • Education 323
  • Geometry and Topology 85
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 132
Replace Robert Granger with:
Robert Granger United States
Donald Macnab United Kingdom
Yusuf F. Zakariya Norway
Stephen Α. Mitchell United States
Xin Tang Finland
Robert J. Silverman United States
Olga Mégalakaki France
Jon Carlson United States
James O. Whittaker United States
Robin H. Lock United States
Stephen Lipscomb relative to Robert Granger United States Robert Granger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Robert Granger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Lipscomb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Lipscomb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Lipscomb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Lipscomb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Lipscomb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Lipscomb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Lipscomb. The network helps show where Stephen Lipscomb may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Lipscomb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Lipscomb Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Lipscomb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Preparing for Life after High School: The Characteristics and Experiences of Youth in Special Education. A Summary of Key Findings from The National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012. NCEE Evaluation Brief.
20183
2
National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012: Design Documentation. NCEE 2017-4021.
201715
3
Preparing for Life after High School: The Characteristics and Experiences of Youth in Special Education. Findings from The National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012. Volume 3: Comparisons over Time. Executive Summary. NCEE 2018-4008.
201723
4
Can student test scores provide useful measures of school principals' performance?
20164
5
Measuring Teachers' Effectiveness: A Report from Phase 3 of Pennsylvania's Pilot of the Framework for Teaching
20152
6
Measuring Teachers' Effectiveness: A Report from Phase 3 of Pennsylvania's Pilot of the Framework for Teaching. Final Report.
20150
7
Measuring School Leaders' Effectiveness: An Interim Report from a Multiyear Pilot of Pennsylvania's Framework for Leadership
20141
8
Is School Value Added Indicative of Principal Quality? Working Paper 12. Revised.
20144
9
Classroom Observations from Phase 2 of the Pennsylvania Teacher Evaluation Pilot: Assessing Internal Consistency, Score Variation, and Relationships with Value Added. Final Report.
20132
10
Improving Post-High School Outcomes for Transition-Age Students with Disabilities: An Evidence Review. NCEE 2013-4011.
201317
11
Value-Added Estimates for Phase 1 of the Pennsylvania Teacher and Principal Evaluation Pilot
20123
12
Value-Added Estimates for Phase 1 of the Pennsylvania Teacher and Principal Evaluation Pilot. Full Report.
20124
13
What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Standards for Evaluating Single Case Designs (SCDs).
20113
14
Early Grade Retention and Student Success: Evidence from Los Angeles.
201114
15
Improving School Accountability in California.
20111
16
Estimating Teacher and School Effectiveness in Pittsburgh: Value-Added Modeling and Results. Final Report.
20101
17
Teacher and Principal Value-Added: Research Findings and Implementation Practices. Final Report.
20100
18
CENTRALIZERS IN THE SEMIGROUP OF PARTIAL TRANSFORMATIONS
199816
19 199660
20
Centralizers of permutations in the partial transformation semigroup
19956

About Stephen Lipscomb

Stephen Lipscomb is a scholar working on Education, Information Systems and Management, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Geometry and Topology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 732 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include School Choice and Performance (16 papers), semigroups and automata theory (9 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (9 papers), Education Systems and Policy (9 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (6 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (5 papers), Disability Education and Employment (4 papers) and Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (171 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (36 citations), Education (323 citations), Geometry and Topology (85 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (132 citations). Stephen Lipscomb has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Dhuey, Brian Gill, Hanley Chiang, Janusz Konieczny, Jill S. Cannon, James C. Perry, Albert Liu, Joshua Haimson, John Burghardt and Matthew Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Semigroup Forum, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Economics of Education Review, Education Finance and Policy and Transactions of the American Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026