Stephen B. Miles

2.0k citations
6 papers · 843 · 1 hit paper · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen B. Miles

5 papers receiving 674 citations

Stephen B. Miles's Hit Papers

The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society 1951 · 728 citations
7280+25+50Years since publication200400600

Peers

Stephen B. Miles
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • History and Philosophy of Science 61
  • Computer Science Applications 42
  • Safety Research 62
  • Architecture 11
  • Communication 46
Replace Steven L. Goldman with:
Steven L. Goldman United States
Pamela McCorduck United States
Peter Kroes Netherlands
Kenneth M. Ford United States
James Shaw United States
Gordon Pask United Kingdom
Bernard Scott United Kingdom
Pieter E. Vermaas Netherlands
Mei‐Hung Chiu Taiwan
Terrell Ward Bynum United States
Stephen B. Miles relative to Steven L. Goldman United States Steven L. Goldman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Steven L. Goldman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen B. Miles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen B. Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen B. Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen B. Miles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen B. Miles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen B. Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen B. Miles. The network helps show where Stephen B. Miles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen B. Miles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen B. Miles Line = papers co-authored together Stephen B. Miles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1
The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society
Hit paper breakdown →
1951728
2 200873
3 201123
4 195516
5
openChart: Charting Quantitative Properties in LOD
20102
6
The Provenance Standardisation Vision
20061

About Stephen B. Miles

Stephen B. Miles is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Molecular Biology, Information Systems, Information Systems and Management and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 6 papers that have together received 843 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Research Data Management Practices (1 paper), Scientific Computing and Data Management (1 paper), RFID technology advancements (1 paper), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (1 paper), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (1 paper), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (1 paper), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (1 paper) and Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (61 citations), Computer Science Applications (42 citations), Safety Research (62 citations), Architecture (11 citations) and Communication (46 citations). Stephen B. Miles has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Norbert Wiener, Le Corbusier, J. P. Emond, Marlin H. Mickle, Stephen Miles, Bill C. Hardgrave, Hao Min, Dimitris Kiritsis, Mohammad Heidari and Thorsten Staake. Their work appears in journals such as Land Economics, IBM Journal of Research and Development, ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) and Cambridge University Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact