Steven L. Goldman

19 papers receiving 859 citations

Peers

Steven L. Goldman
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 279
  • Management Information Systems 233
  • Strategy and Management 210
  • Sociology and Political Science 152
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 116
Replace Hamid R. Ekbia with:
Hamid R. Ekbia United States
Tim Brown United States
Lambèr Royakkers Netherlands
Tom Peters United States
Massimo Warglien Italy
Philip Brey Netherlands
Min Basadur Canada
Elihu M. Gerson United States
Christian Hildebrand Switzerland
Jonathan Lean United Kingdom
Steven L. Goldman relative to Hamid R. Ekbia United States Hamid R. Ekbia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Hamid R. Ekbia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steven L. Goldman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven L. Goldman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven L. Goldman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven L. Goldman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven L. Goldman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven L. Goldman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven L. Goldman. The network helps show where Steven L. Goldman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven L. Goldman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven L. Goldman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven L. Goldman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven L. Goldman. Steven L. Goldman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 2
3 16
4
Science wars : what scientists know and how they know it
10
5 53
6
Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations
318
7 8
8 172
9 23
10
Estudios sobre sociedad y tecnologia
14
11 1
12 323
13 1
14 13
15 1
16 4
17 3
18 23
19 19
20 3

About Steven L. Goldman

Steven L. Goldman is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Aging and Philosophy, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Science and Education Research (2 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (2 papers) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (279 citations), Management Information Systems (233 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (86 citations). Steven L. Goldman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Roger N. Nagel, Larry A. Hickman, Michael E. Zimmerman, Don Ihde, Susan E. Cozzens, Melvin Kranzberg, Stephen H. Cutcliffe, José Sanmartín Esplugues, Mary Tiles and Manuel Medina. Their work appears in journals such as Technology and Culture, International Journal of Technology Management and Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026