Peter Kroes

47 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Peter Kroes
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • History and Philosophy of Science 125
  • Human-Computer Interaction 89
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 96
  • Information Systems and Management 89
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 233
Replace Ronald R. Kline with:
Ronald R. Kline United States
Pieter E. Vermaas Netherlands
Wybo Houkes Netherlands
Howard Falk United States
Kenneth M. Ford United States
Pamela McCorduck United States
Steven L. Goldman United States
Stephen B. Miles United States
Miles MacLeod Netherlands
Maarten Franssen Netherlands
Peter Kroes relative to Ronald R. Kline United States Ronald R. Kline's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Ronald R. Kline · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Kroes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Kroes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Kroes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Kroes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Kroes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Kroes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Kroes. The network helps show where Peter Kroes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Peter Kroes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Kroes Line = papers co-authored together Peter Kroes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002112
2 2006101
3 200683
4 200681
5 201271
6 201167
7 201459
8
The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology
200057
9 200746
10 201145
11 201041
12 200939
13 199237
14 201635
15 201431
16 199830
17 200622
18 198920
19 198420
20 200118

About Peter Kroes

Peter Kroes is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Mechanical Engineering, History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Design Education and Practice (11 papers), Cognitive Science and Education Research (8 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers), Product Development and Customization (4 papers), Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (4 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers) and Information Systems Theories and Implementation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (125 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (89 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (96 citations), Information Systems and Management (89 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (233 citations). Peter Kroes has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Anthonie Meijers, Maarten Franssen, Ibo van de Poel, Pieter E. Vermaas, Peter‐Paul Verbeek, Wybo Houkes, Per Galle, Philip J. Nickel, Steven A. Moore and Andrew Light. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Design Studies, Synthese, Philosophy of Science and Cambridge Journal of Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact