Pamela McCorduck

17 papers receiving 854 citations

Peers

Pamela McCorduck
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Health Informatics 35
  • History and Philosophy of Science 63
  • Safety Research 91
  • Artificial Intelligence 323
  • Computer Science Applications 54
Replace Kenneth M. Ford with:
Kenneth M. Ford United States
Peter Kroes Netherlands
James Shaw United States
Stephen B. Miles United States
Bart Verheij Netherlands
Harold Borko United States
Tobias Blanke United Kingdom
Massimo Franceschet Italy
Béla Gipp Germany
Janice D. Gobert United States
Pamela McCorduck relative to Kenneth M. Ford United States Kenneth M. Ford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Kenneth M. Ford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pamela McCorduck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pamela McCorduck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pamela McCorduck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pamela McCorduck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pamela McCorduck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pamela McCorduck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pamela McCorduck. The network helps show where Pamela McCorduck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Pamela McCorduck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pamela McCorduck Line = papers co-authored together Pamela McCorduck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 20078
2 2004174
3
The Futures of Women: Scenarios for the 21st Century
199711
4 199132
5
Aaron's code
199042
6
The Rise of the Expert Company; How Visionary Companies Are Using Artificial Intelligence to .......
19892
7
Artificial intelligence: an aperc¸u
19891
8
The rise of the expert company
1988163
9
The rise of the expert company : how visionary companies are using artificial intelligence to achieve higher productivity and profits
198820
10
From Drill Sergeant to Intellectual Assistant: Computers in Schools.
19863
11
The Universal Machine: Confessions of a Technological Optimist
198518
12 19841
13 19840
14
Land of the Rising Fifth Generation Computer.
19832
15 1983207
16 19836
17 198242
18
Machines Who Think
1979284
19
History of artificial intelligence
197721

About Pamela McCorduck

Pamela McCorduck is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies (1 paper), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (1 paper) and Ego Development and Educational Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (35 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (63 citations) and Safety Research (91 citations). Pamela McCorduck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Edward A. Feigenbaum, H. Penny Nii, Michael J. Apter, Roger F. Malina, Harold Cohen, Oliver G. Selfridge, Herbert A. Simon, Margaret Minsky, I. Milojević and Riane Eisler. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026