Stephen Miles

790 citations
14 papers · 205 indexed · h-index 6

Stephen Miles

11 papers receiving 151 citations

Peers

Stephen Miles
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Music 57
  • Media Technology 39
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 16
  • Communication 13
  • Literature and Literary Theory 20
Replace Richard Comerford with:
Richard Comerford United States
Ade Mabogunje United States
Jarno Ojala Finland
Michael Richey United States
Carl Reidsema Australia
Aliye Karabulut‐Ilgu United States
Roxanne Moore United States
Ianus Keller Netherlands
Justice T. Walker United States
Valéria Farinazzo Martins Brazil
Stephen Miles relative to Richard Comerford United States Richard Comerford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28.5×
Richard Comerford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Miles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Miles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Miles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Miles. The network helps show where Stephen Miles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Miles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Miles Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Miles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 20214
2 20201
3
Exploring Unexplored Frontiers: The Private Right of Action Under the Louisiana Securities Law
20150
4 20101
5
6 Steps to (Re)Building a Top Management Team
20083
6 200873
7
Second in command: the misunderstood role of the chief operating officer.
200616
8 19955
9 19941
10 199427
11 19935
12 199350
13 19923
14 198016

About Stephen Miles

Stephen Miles is a scholar working on Music, General Arts and Humanities, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 205 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musicology and Musical Analysis (5 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (2 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (2 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (1 paper), Property Rights and Legal Doctrine (1 paper), Influenza Virus Research Studies (1 paper), Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence (1 paper) and Music History and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (57 citations), Media Technology (39 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (16 citations), Communication (13 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (20 citations). Stephen Miles has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Rose Rosengard Subotnik, Nathan Bennett, Gregory Whitehead, Douglas A. Kahn, Stephen B. Miles, Marlin H. Mickle, J.T. Cain, Mohammad Heidari, Thorsten Staake and Sanjay E. Sarma. Their work appears in journals such as Notes, TDR/The Drama Review, Frontiers in Immunology, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026