Stephani Foraker

993 total citations
8 papers, 581 citations indexed

About

Stephani Foraker is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephani Foraker has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 581 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 3 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Stephani Foraker's work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (7 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers). Stephani Foraker is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (7 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers). Stephani Foraker collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. Stephani Foraker's co-authors include Brian McElree, Gregory L. Murphy, Jean-Pierre Koenig, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Naveen Khetarpal, Amy Perfors, Gail Mauner and Terry Regier and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Journal of Memory and Language and Cognitive Science.

In The Last Decade

Stephani Foraker

8 papers receiving 546 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Stephani Foraker United States	7	415	320	180	162	156	8	581
Gail Mauner United States	11	333 0.8×	266 0.8×	131 0.7×	158 1.0×	199 1.3×	19	499
Eva Smolka Germany	13	422 1.0×	389 1.2×	95 0.5×	184 1.1×	91 0.6×	24	589
Robert Fiorentino United States	16	603 1.5×	543 1.7×	113 0.6×	204 1.3×	178 1.1×	35	761
Willem M. Mak Netherlands	11	432 1.0×	408 1.3×	144 0.8×	204 1.3×	288 1.8×	25	709
Jennifer Spenader Netherlands	10	217 0.5×	225 0.7×	179 1.0×	145 0.9×	233 1.5×	49	532
Andrea Gualmini United States	12	300 0.7×	538 1.7×	163 0.9×	126 0.8×	403 2.6×	31	756
Barbara Hemforth France	13	418 1.0×	269 0.8×	141 0.8×	173 1.1×	277 1.8×	61	589
Hartmut Fitz Netherlands	10	622 1.5×	417 1.3×	117 0.7×	200 1.2×	109 0.7×	21	730
Masaya Yoshida United States	13	377 0.9×	242 0.8×	220 1.2×	165 1.0×	375 2.4×	41	680
Kumiko Fukumura United Kingdom	11	283 0.7×	169 0.5×	202 1.1×	176 1.1×	199 1.3×	18	452

Countries citing papers authored by Stephani Foraker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephani Foraker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephani Foraker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephani Foraker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephani Foraker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephani Foraker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephani Foraker. The network helps show where Stephani Foraker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephani Foraker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephani Foraker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephani Foraker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephani Foraker. Stephani Foraker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Koenig, Jean-Pierre, et al.. (2017). About sharing and commitment: the retrieval of biased and balanced irregular polysemes. Language Cognition and Neuroscience. 33(4). 443–466. 30 indexed citations

2.

Foraker, Stephani, et al.. (2016). Processing of irregular polysemes in sentence reading.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 42(11). 1798–1813. 26 indexed citations

3.

Foraker, Stephani & Gregory L. Murphy. (2012). Polysemy in sentence comprehension: Effects of meaning dominance. Journal of Memory and Language. 67(4). 407–425. 64 indexed citations

4.

Foraker, Stephani & Brian McElree. (2011). Comprehension of Linguistic Dependencies: Speed‐Accuracy Tradeoff Evidence for Direct‐Access Retrieval From Memory. Language and Linguistics Compass. 5(11). 764–783. 27 indexed citations

5.

Foraker, Stephani, Terry Regier, Naveen Khetarpal, Amy Perfors, & Joshua B. Tenenbaum. (2009). Indirect Evidence and the Poverty of the Stimulus: The Case of AnaphoricOne. Cognitive Science. 33(2). 287–300. 37 indexed citations

6.

Foraker, Stephani, et al.. (2007). Indirect Evidence and the Poverty of the Stimulus: The Case of Anaphoric One. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide). 29(29). 6 indexed citations

7.

Foraker, Stephani & Brian McElree. (2006). The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations☆. Journal of Memory and Language. 56(3). 357–383. 99 indexed citations

8.

McElree, Brian, et al.. (2003). Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. 48(1). 67–91. 292 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact