Stephani Foraker

993 citations
8 papers · 581 indexed · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Stephani Foraker

8 papers receiving 546 citations

Peers

Stephani Foraker
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 320
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 415
  • Language and Linguistics 156
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 162
  • Artificial Intelligence 180
Replace Gail Mauner with:
Gail Mauner United States
Eva Smolka Germany
Robert Fiorentino United States
Jennifer Spenader Netherlands
Daniel Freudenthal United Kingdom
Andrea Gualmini United States
Willem M. Mak Netherlands
Luisa Meroni United States
Hartmut Fitz Netherlands
Barbara Hemforth France
Stephani Foraker relative to Gail Mauner United States Gail Mauner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Gail Mauner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephani Foraker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephani Foraker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephani Foraker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephani Foraker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephani Foraker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephani Foraker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephani Foraker. The network helps show where Stephani Foraker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Stephani Foraker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephani Foraker Line = papers co-authored together Stephani Foraker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2003292
2 200699
3 201264
4 200937
5 201730
6 201127
7 201626
8
Indirect Evidence and the Poverty of the Stimulus: The Case of Anaphoric One
20076

About Stephani Foraker

Stephani Foraker is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cultural Studies, having authored 8 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (7 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (2 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers), Topic Modeling (2 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (1 paper) and Language and cultural evolution (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (320 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (415 citations), Language and Linguistics (156 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (162 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (180 citations). Stephani Foraker has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Brian McElree, Gregory L. Murphy, Jean-Pierre Koenig, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Amy Perfors, Naveen Khetarpal, Gail Mauner and Terry Regier. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Memory and Language, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Cognitive Science, Language and Linguistics Compass and Language Cognition and Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact