Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Hemforth
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Hemforth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Hemforth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Hemforth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Hemforth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Hemforth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Hemforth. The network helps show where Barbara Hemforth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Barbara Hemforth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Barbara Hemforth.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Barbara Hemforth based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Barbara Hemforth. Barbara Hemforth is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hemforth, Barbara, et al.. (2021). Acceptability of extractions out of adjuncts depends on discourse factors. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).
2.
Miller, Philip & Barbara Hemforth. (2020). Acceptability of VP ellipsis: discourse conditions vs. syntactic identity. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).
Grillo, Nino, et al.. (2015). Pseudo relatives are easier than relative clauses: evidence from Tense. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository.4 indexed citations
12.
Colonna, Saveria, et al.. (2012). Different effects of focus in intra- and inter-sentential pronoun resolution in German and French. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).1 indexed citations
13.
Konieczny, Lars, et al.. (2011). Secret Agents or Sleeping Beauties: What Happens to Repaired Constituents?. Cognitive Science. 33(33).
14.
Baumann, Peter, Lars Konieczny, & Barbara Hemforth. (2011). Pragmatic expectations and coreference: how alternative constructions and referring expressions can serve as cues. Cognitive Science. 33(33).3 indexed citations
15.
Colonna, Saveria, et al.. (2011). Priming in French anaphora resolution. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository.1 indexed citations
16.
Beyssade, Claire, Barbara Hemforth, Jean-Marie Marandin, & Cristel Portès. (2010). Information focus in French. paper 109–0.2 indexed citations
17.
Hemforth, Barbara & Lars Konieczny. (2004). Scopal ambiguity preferences in German negated clauses. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 26(26).3 indexed citations
18.
Konieczny, Lars, Sarah Schimke, & Barbara Hemforth. (2004). An activation-based model of agreement errors in production and Comprehension. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 26(26).5 indexed citations
19.
Hemforth, Barbara, Lars Konieczny, Harald Seelig, & Michael Walter. (2000). Case Matching and Relative Clause Attachment. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 29(1). 81–88.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.