Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Siegfried Engelmann
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Siegfried Engelmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Siegfried Engelmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Siegfried Engelmann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Siegfried Engelmann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Siegfried Engelmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Siegfried Engelmann. The network helps show where Siegfried Engelmann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Siegfried Engelmann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Siegfried Engelmann.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Siegfried Engelmann based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Siegfried Engelmann. Siegfried Engelmann is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Engelmann, Siegfried. (2011). Critique and Erasure: Responding to Eppley's "Reading Mastery as Pegagogy of Erasure".. Journal of Research in Rural Education. 26(15). 1.1 indexed citations
Engelmann, Siegfried. (1999). A Response: How Sound Is High/Scope Research?.. Educational leadership. 56(6). 83–84.1 indexed citations
4.
Engelmann, Siegfried. (1999). The Benefits of Direct Instruction: Affirmative Action for At-Risk Students.. Educational leadership. 57(1).25 indexed citations
Engelmann, Siegfried. (1988). The Direct Instruction Follow Through Model: Design and Outcomes.. Education and Treatment of Children. 11(4).76 indexed citations
11.
Engelmann, Siegfried. (1988). The Logic and Facts of Effective Supervision.. Education and Treatment of Children. 11(4).14 indexed citations
12.
Engelmann, Siegfried. (1980). Toward the Design of Faultless Instruction: The Theoretical Basis of Concept Analysis.. Educational Technology archive. 20(2). 28–36.15 indexed citations
13.
Becker, Wesley C. & Siegfried Engelmann. (1976). Evaluation of instruction.1 indexed citations
14.
Becker, Wesley C. & Siegfried Engelmann. (1976). Analysis of Achievement Data on Six Cohorts of Low-Income Children From 20 School Districts in the University of Oregon Direct Instruction Follow Through Model..24 indexed citations
15.
Engelmann, Siegfried. (1975). Your child can succeed : how to get the most out of school for your child.1 indexed citations
16.
Becker, Wesley C. & Siegfried Engelmann. (1973). Summary Analyses of Five-Year Data on Achievement and Teaching Progress with 14,000 Children in 20 Projects. Technical Report 73-2. Preliminary Report..
17.
Engelmann, Siegfried. (1969). Preventing failure in the primary grades. Medical Entomology and Zoology.42 indexed citations
18.
Engelmann, Siegfried. (1967). The basic concept inventory.8 indexed citations
19.
Engelmann, Siegfried. (1966). Give your child a superior mind.23 indexed citations
20.
Bereiter, Carl, et al.. (1966). Teaching Disadvantaged Children. American Educational Research Journal. 3(4). 313–313.17 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.