Shelley Yeo
- Education top 2%
- Safety Research top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Health Informatics top 2%
- Information Systems and Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Marjan ZadnikDavid F. TreagustMatthew KearneyHye‐Eun ChuBeverley OliverRitu GuptaBeatrice TuckerRobert D. Loss
- Topics
- Academic integrity and plagiarism (5 papers)Science Education and Pedagogy (5 papers)Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
Shelley Yeo
17 papers receiving 514 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Education 362
- Safety Research 166
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 137
- Health Informatics 55
- Information Systems and Management 45
Countries citing papers authored by Shelley Yeo
This map shows the geographic impact of Shelley Yeo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shelley Yeo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shelley Yeo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shelley Yeo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shelley Yeo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shelley Yeo. The network helps show where Shelley Yeo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shelley Yeo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shelley Yeo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shelley Yeo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shelley Yeo. Shelley Yeo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Academic Staff Responses to Student Plagiarism in Universities: A Literature Review from 1990 to 2019. | 10 |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | Preparing Demonstrators for First Year Science Laboratories | 1 |
| 4 | Science and engineering students’ beliefs about plagiarism: ‘It’s only an assignment’ | 4 |
| 5 | 65 | |
| 6 | Making a Difference: Student Perceptions of E-learning Blended with Traditional Teaching Methods | 3 |
| 7 | Interpretations of Comparability and Equivalence around Assessment: Views of Academic Staff in Transnational Education | 0 |
| 8 | Collaborative approaches to moderation of assessment in transnational education | 1 |
| 9 | 51 | |
| 10 | 130 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 136 | |
| 16 | 63 | |
| 17 | Newton, We Have a Problem. | 5 |
| 18 | 21 |
About Shelley Yeo
Shelley Yeo is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Safety Research and Human Factors and Ergonomics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 590 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic integrity and plagiarism (5 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (5 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (55 citations), Safety Research (166 citations) and Education (362 citations). Shelley Yeo has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Marjan Zadnik, David F. Treagust, Matthew Kearney, Hye‐Eun Chu, Beverley Oliver, Ritu Gupta, Beatrice Tucker, Robert D. Loss, Peter Taylor and Allan G. Harrison. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physics, Science Education and International Journal of Science Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.