Sarah Seymour‐Smith
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Pharmacy top 5%
- Co-authors
- Margaret WetherellAnn PhoenixBrendan GoughMatthew HallJuliane A. KloessBelinda WinderAnthony R. BeechCatherine Hamilton‐Giachritsis
- Topics
- Gender, Feminism, and Media (7 papers)Gender Roles and Identity Studies (5 papers)Media, Gender, and Advertising (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaHealth PsychologyAppetite
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaUganda
In The Last Decade
Sarah Seymour‐Smith
30 papers receiving 562 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Gender Studies 231
- Sociology and Political Science 189
- Clinical Psychology 150
- General Health Professions 113
- Pharmacy 67
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Seymour‐Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Seymour‐Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Seymour‐Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Seymour‐Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Seymour‐Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Seymour‐Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Seymour‐Smith. The network helps show where Sarah Seymour‐Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Seymour‐Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Seymour‐Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Seymour‐Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Seymour‐Smith. Sarah Seymour‐Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | Writing for the Research Excellence Framework 2021: Guidance for qualitative psychologists | 4 |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 48 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | Opening the box: evaluating the Citizens Council of NICE: report prepared for the National Co-ordinating Centre for Research Methodology, NHS Research and Development Programme | 12 |
| 20 | 202 |
About Sarah Seymour‐Smith
Sarah Seymour‐Smith is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Pharmacy and Clinical Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 592 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (7 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (5 papers) and Media, Gender, and Advertising (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (231 citations), Pharmacy (67 citations) and Clinical Psychology (150 citations). Sarah Seymour‐Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Uganda. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Wetherell, Ann Phoenix, Brendan Gough, Matthew Hall, Juliane A. Kloess, Belinda Winder, Anthony R. Beech, Catherine Hamilton‐Giachritsis, Jo Cranwell and David Shipley. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Health Psychology and Appetite.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.