Paula Reavey
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Steven D. BrownLaura McGrathDavid J. HarperJohn CrombyKatherine JohnsonBrendan GoughCarla WilligAngela Harden
- Topics
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement (13 papers)Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (9 papers)Participatory Visual Research Methods (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaSocial Science & MedicineBMC Public Health
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNorwaySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Paula Reavey
74 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Clinical Psychology 510
- Sociology and Political Science 369
- General Health Professions 305
- Social Psychology 275
- Gender Studies 151
Countries citing papers authored by Paula Reavey
This map shows the geographic impact of Paula Reavey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paula Reavey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paula Reavey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paula Reavey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paula Reavey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paula Reavey. The network helps show where Paula Reavey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paula Reavey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paula Reavey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paula Reavey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paula Reavey. Paula Reavey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | A Handbook of Visual Methods in Psychology: Using and Interpreting Images in Qualitative Research: Second Edition | 1 |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 28 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | Dis/locating blame within the individual: women survivors talk about child sexual abuse | 3 |
| 20 | 17 |
About Paula Reavey
Paula Reavey is a scholar working on General Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (13 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (9 papers) and Participatory Visual Research Methods (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (510 citations), Conservation (62 citations) and Gender Studies (151 citations). Paula Reavey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Steven D. Brown, Laura McGrath, David J. Harper, John Cromby, Katherine Johnson, Brendan Gough, Carla Willig, Angela Harden, Val Gillies and Ian Tucker. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Science & Medicine and BMC Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.