Matthew L. Long

444 total citations
10 papers, 294 citations indexed

About

Matthew L. Long is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew L. Long has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 294 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Clinical Psychology and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Matthew L. Long's work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (3 papers) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers). Matthew L. Long is often cited by papers focused on Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (3 papers) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers). Matthew L. Long collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Matthew L. Long's co-authors include Michelle McManus, Laurence Alison, Nicola Power, Sarah Seymour‐Smith, Anthony R. Beech, David Shipley, Ricardo Tejeiro, Juliane A. Kloess, L Alison and Louise Almond and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Applied Social Psychology and Sexual Abuse.

In The Last Decade

Matthew L. Long

10 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Matthew L. Long United Kingdom 8 176 174 49 45 38 10 294
Caitlyn N. Muniz United States 9 166 0.9× 143 0.8× 28 0.6× 62 1.4× 38 1.0× 23 285
Robert Lehmann Germany 11 219 1.2× 259 1.5× 45 0.9× 28 0.6× 20 0.5× 54 325
James F. Quinn United States 9 332 1.9× 239 1.4× 96 2.0× 25 0.6× 60 1.6× 17 419
Eileen M. Alexy United States 7 250 1.4× 191 1.1× 73 1.5× 50 1.1× 76 2.0× 9 318
Anne M. Bartol 7 166 0.9× 139 0.8× 22 0.4× 55 1.2× 13 0.3× 13 283
Jason Roach United Kingdom 11 168 1.0× 137 0.8× 22 0.4× 41 0.9× 7 0.2× 52 323
Sébastien Brouillette‐Alarie Canada 11 252 1.4× 262 1.5× 66 1.3× 29 0.6× 8 0.2× 27 347
Caitlin Clemmow United Kingdom 7 172 1.0× 95 0.5× 9 0.2× 42 0.9× 6 0.2× 25 207
José R. Agustina Spain 11 138 0.8× 85 0.5× 160 3.3× 29 0.6× 33 0.9× 38 288
Philip Birch Australia 10 139 0.8× 111 0.6× 54 1.1× 34 0.8× 4 0.1× 53 280

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew L. Long

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew L. Long's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew L. Long with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew L. Long more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew L. Long

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew L. Long. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew L. Long. The network helps show where Matthew L. Long may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew L. Long

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew L. Long. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew L. Long based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew L. Long. Matthew L. Long is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Tejeiro, Ricardo, et al.. (2020). Sexual Behaviours in Indecent Images of Children: A Content Analysis. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 14(1). 121. 2 indexed citations
2.
Long, Matthew L., et al.. (2016). KIRAT: Law enforcement’s prioritization tool for investigating indecent image offenders.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 22(1). 12–21. 38 indexed citations
3.
Marzano, Lisa, et al.. (2016). Police and Suicide Prevention. Crisis. 37(3). 194–204. 28 indexed citations
4.
Kloess, Juliane A., Sarah Seymour‐Smith, Catherine Hamilton‐Giachritsis, et al.. (2015). A Qualitative Analysis of Offenders’ Modus Operandi in Sexually Exploitative Interactions With Children Online. Sexual Abuse. 29(6). 563–591. 48 indexed citations
5.
McManus, Michelle, Matthew L. Long, L Alison, & Louise Almond. (2014). Factors associated with contact child sexual abuse in a sample of indecent image offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression. 21(3). 368–384. 30 indexed citations
6.
Alison, Laurence, et al.. (2013). The effects of subjective time pressure and individual differences on hypotheses generation and action prioritization in police investigations.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 19(1). 83–93. 25 indexed citations
7.
Alison, Laurence, et al.. (2012). Immersive Simulated Learning Environments for Researching Critical Incidents. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. 7(3). 255–272. 51 indexed citations
8.
Long, Matthew L., et al.. (2012). Child Pornography and Likelihood of Contact Abuse. Sexual Abuse. 25(4). 370–395. 62 indexed citations
9.
Jonathan-Zamir, Tal, Laurence Alison, & Matthew L. Long. (2007). The Influence of Media Coverage on Responses to a Hypothetical Burglary Scenario1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 37(3). 631–657. 1 indexed citations
10.
Long, Matthew L., et al.. (1979). A language-cultural course for foreign psychiatric residents. American Journal of Psychiatry. 136(8). 1064–1067. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026