Sarah K. Beamer

1.7k total citations
40 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Sarah K. Beamer is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Molecular Biology and Food Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah K. Beamer has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 15 papers in Molecular Biology and 15 papers in Food Science. Recurrent topics in Sarah K. Beamer's work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (24 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (15 papers) and Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (11 papers). Sarah K. Beamer is often cited by papers focused on Meat and Animal Product Quality (24 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (15 papers) and Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (11 papers). Sarah K. Beamer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and China. Sarah K. Beamer's co-authors include Jacek Jaczynski, Kristen E. Matak, Reza Tahergorabi, Janet C. Tou, Yi‐Chen Chen, Joseph C. Gigliotti, Huina Zheng, Lâtif Taşkaya, Kenneth J. Semmens and Susan Partington and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Food Chemistry and Journal of Food Science.

In The Last Decade

Sarah K. Beamer

40 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah K. Beamer United States 22 764 581 499 331 287 40 1.4k
Nalan Gökoğlu Türkiye 21 971 1.3× 579 1.0× 617 1.2× 493 1.5× 257 0.9× 78 1.8k
Pınar Yerlikaya Türkiye 19 602 0.8× 320 0.6× 376 0.8× 384 1.2× 181 0.6× 46 1.2k
Isabel Sánchez‐Alonso Spain 22 786 1.0× 625 1.1× 354 0.7× 250 0.8× 201 0.7× 38 1.5k
Zdzisław E. Sikorski Poland 18 734 1.0× 461 0.8× 478 1.0× 265 0.8× 169 0.6× 44 1.4k
Wenjin Wu China 22 641 0.8× 357 0.6× 386 0.8× 181 0.5× 98 0.3× 77 1.2k
Gülsün Özyurt Türkiye 19 787 1.0× 448 0.8× 519 1.0× 550 1.7× 230 0.8× 64 1.5k
Chyuan‐Yuan Shiau Taiwan 20 780 1.0× 432 0.7× 1.2k 2.5× 457 1.4× 155 0.5× 46 1.9k
T. Jyothirmayi India 16 439 0.6× 483 0.8× 1.0k 2.1× 543 1.6× 137 0.5× 28 1.5k
Supatra Karnjanapratum Thailand 24 400 0.5× 359 0.6× 625 1.3× 444 1.3× 145 0.5× 63 1.5k
Ya Wei China 19 406 0.5× 268 0.5× 531 1.1× 135 0.4× 176 0.6× 49 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah K. Beamer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah K. Beamer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah K. Beamer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah K. Beamer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah K. Beamer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah K. Beamer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah K. Beamer. The network helps show where Sarah K. Beamer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah K. Beamer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah K. Beamer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah K. Beamer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah K. Beamer. Sarah K. Beamer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zheng, Huina, Sarah K. Beamer, Kristen E. Matak, & Jacek Jaczynski. (2018). Effect of κ-carrageenan on gelation and gel characteristics of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) protein isolated with isoelectric solubilization/precipitation. Food Chemistry. 278. 644–652. 109 indexed citations
2.
Smith, Elizabeth B., Sarah K. Beamer, Kristen E. Matak, & Jacek Jaczynski. (2017). Storage stability of egg sticks fortified with omega‐3 fatty acids. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 98(9). 3452–3461. 11 indexed citations
3.
Shi, Liu, Sarah K. Beamer, Hong Yang, & Jacek Jaczynski. (2017). Micro-emulsification/encapsulation of krill oil by complex coacervation with krill protein isolated using isoelectric solubilization/precipitation. Food Chemistry. 244. 284–291. 50 indexed citations
4.
Beamer, Sarah K., et al.. (2013). Effect of electron beam on chemical changes of nutrients in infant formula. Food Chemistry. 149. 208–214. 16 indexed citations
5.
Tahergorabi, Reza, Sarah K. Beamer, Kristen E. Matak, & Jacek Jaczynski. (2013). Chemical properties of ω-3 fortified gels made of protein isolate recovered with isoelectric solubilisation/precipitation from whole fish. Food Chemistry. 139(1-4). 777–785. 23 indexed citations
6.
Tahergorabi, Reza, et al.. (2013). Physicochemical properties of surimi gels fortified with dietary fiber. Food Chemistry. 148. 70–76. 93 indexed citations
7.
Tahergorabi, Reza, et al.. (2013). Interactions of dietary fibre and omega-3-rich oil with protein in surimi gels developed with salt substitute. Food Chemistry. 141(1). 201–208. 74 indexed citations
9.
Matak, Kristen E., et al.. (2013). Effect of Dietary Inclusion of Conjugated Linoleic Acid on Quality Indicators of Aged Pork Loin. Journal of Agricultural Science. 5(6). 1 indexed citations
10.
Tahergorabi, Reza, et al.. (2012). A three‐prong strategy to develop functional food using protein isolates recovered from chicken processing by‐products with isoelectric solubilization/precipitation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 92(12). 2534–2542. 13 indexed citations
11.
Beamer, Sarah K., et al.. (2012). Sensory evaluation and quality indicators of nutritionally-enhanced egg product with ω-3 rich oils. LWT. 47(2). 459–464. 17 indexed citations
12.
Beamer, Sarah K., et al.. (2011). Radioresistance development of DNA repair deficientEscherichia coliDH5α in ground beef subjected to electron beam at sub-lethal doses. International Journal of Radiation Biology. 87(6). 571–578. 11 indexed citations
13.
Turk, Philip, et al.. (2011). The Effect of a Flaxseed Oil‐Enhanced Diet on the Product Quality of Farmed Brook Trout  (Salvelinus fontinalis)  Fillets. Journal of Food Science. 76(3). S192–7. 18 indexed citations
14.
Gigliotti, Joseph C., et al.. (2011). Characterization of lipids and antioxidant capacity of novel nutraceutical egg products developed with omega‐3‐rich oils. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 92(1). 66–73. 37 indexed citations
16.
Matak, Kristen E., et al.. (2010). Recovery of  Salmonella enterica  Serovars Typhimurium and Tennessee in Peanut Butter after Electron Beam Exposure. Journal of Food Science. 75(7). M462–7. 14 indexed citations
17.
Beamer, Sarah K., et al.. (2010). Use of Electron Beam Radiation for the Reduction of Salmonella enterica Serovars Typhimurium and Tennessee in Peanut Butter. Journal of Food Protection. 73(2). 353–357. 32 indexed citations
18.
Beamer, Sarah K., et al.. (2009). Survival of Escherichia coli after Isoelectric Solubilization and Precipitation of Fish Protein. Journal of Food Protection. 72(7). 1398–1403. 21 indexed citations
19.
Beamer, Sarah K., et al.. (2009). Survival of Listeria innocua after Isoelectric Solubilization and Precipitation of Fish Protein. Journal of Food Science. 74(4). M201–5. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026