Sarah J. Tracy
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.2%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Education top 0.5%
- General Health Professions top 0.5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Cliff ScottKaren TracyPamela Lutgen‐SandvikAngela TretheweyJess K. AlbertsKaren K. MyersMichael S. ShaferJennifer A. Scarduzio
- Topics
- Management and Organizational Studies (22 papers)Emotional Labor in Professions (15 papers)Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaSustainabilityJournal of Anxiety Disorders
- Partner nations
- United StatesIrelandCanada
In The Last Decade
Sarah J. Tracy
63 papers receiving 8.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 189
- Sociology and Political Science 3.6k
- Social Psychology 1.7k
- Education 1.4k
- General Health Professions 1.4k
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah J. Tracy
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah J. Tracy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah J. Tracy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah J. Tracy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah J. Tracy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah J. Tracy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah J. Tracy. The network helps show where Sarah J. Tracy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah J. Tracy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah J. Tracy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah J. Tracy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah J. Tracy. Sarah J. Tracy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 65 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Researchbreakdown → | 4115 |
| 16 | Dirty work and discipline behind bars | 7 |
| 17 | 106 | |
| 18 | Watching the watchers: Making sense of emotional constructions behind bars | 1 |
| 19 | 121 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Sarah J. Tracy
Sarah J. Tracy is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration and Communication, having authored 69 papers that have together received 9.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (22 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (15 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.2k citations), Communication (729 citations) and Gender Studies (954 citations). Sarah J. Tracy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Cliff Scott, Karen Tracy, Pamela Lutgen‐Sandvik, Angela Trethewey, Jess K. Alberts, Karen K. Myers, Michael S. Shafer, Jennifer A. Scarduzio, Ryan S. Bisel and Alaina C. Zanin. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Sustainability and Journal of Anxiety Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.