Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact
- Authors
- Sarah J. Tracy
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w59019403 →Countries where authors are citing Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact
This map shows the geographic impact of Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact
This network shows the impact of Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact.
About Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact
This paper, published in 2012, received 2.4k indexed citations . Written by Sarah J. Tracy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (916 citations), Education (405 citations) and Communication (352 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w59019403.