Robert M. Chiles

543 total citations
20 papers, 333 citations indexed

About

Robert M. Chiles is a scholar working on Food Science, Ecology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert M. Chiles has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 333 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Food Science, 6 papers in Ecology and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Robert M. Chiles's work include Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (6 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (5 papers) and Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (4 papers). Robert M. Chiles is often cited by papers focused on Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (6 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (5 papers) and Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (4 papers). Robert M. Chiles collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Canada. Robert M. Chiles's co-authors include Amy Fitzgerald, Leland Glenna, Hong Wu, Garrett M. Broad, Mark Gagnon, Carolyn Sachs, C. Clare Hinrichs, Kelly B. Beck, Nicole E. Negowetti and Robin B. DiPietro and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Ecological Indicators and Environmental Management.

In The Last Decade

Robert M. Chiles

19 papers receiving 321 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert M. Chiles United States 9 130 108 66 46 44 20 333
Annika Lonkila Finland 9 133 1.0× 101 0.9× 65 1.0× 62 1.3× 74 1.7× 18 462
Evan Gravely Canada 2 61 0.5× 70 0.6× 111 1.7× 91 2.0× 30 0.7× 2 370
Maria Elena Marescotti Italy 12 97 0.7× 71 0.7× 84 1.3× 46 1.0× 20 0.5× 22 354
Giovanni Peira Italy 13 63 0.5× 166 1.5× 120 1.8× 20 0.4× 103 2.3× 35 418
Bethaney Turner Australia 9 46 0.4× 96 0.9× 244 3.7× 34 0.7× 50 1.1× 38 505
Federico Antonioli Italy 12 312 2.4× 218 2.0× 115 1.7× 129 2.8× 28 0.6× 23 630
Anna Kiss Hungary 12 44 0.3× 51 0.5× 34 0.5× 12 0.3× 48 1.1× 35 404
Francesco Di Iacovo Italy 14 37 0.3× 49 0.5× 188 2.8× 151 3.3× 54 1.2× 38 502
Meike Rombach New Zealand 13 91 0.7× 211 2.0× 156 2.4× 13 0.3× 48 1.1× 49 486
Serena Mandolesi Italy 12 99 0.8× 82 0.8× 103 1.6× 58 1.3× 42 1.0× 23 355

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Chiles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Chiles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Chiles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Chiles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Chiles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Chiles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Chiles. The network helps show where Robert M. Chiles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert M. Chiles

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert M. Chiles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert M. Chiles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert M. Chiles. Robert M. Chiles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chiles, Robert M., et al.. (2025). A systematic review of ecosystem services modeling for environmental health assessment. Ecological Indicators. 172. 113245–113245. 2 indexed citations
2.
Wu, Hong, et al.. (2024). Sustainability outcomes and policy implications: Evaluating China’s “old urban neighborhood renewal” experiment. PLoS ONE. 19(4). e0301380–e0301380. 3 indexed citations
3.
Wu, Hong, et al.. (2022). Ecosystem Benefits Provision of Green Stormwater Infrastructure in Chinese Sponge Cities. Environmental Management. 69(3). 558–575. 27 indexed citations
4.
Chiles, Robert M., et al.. (2022). Empowering students to confront environmental injustice: Dialogue, theory, empathy, and partnership. SN Social Sciences. 2(12). 255–255.
5.
Broad, Garrett M. & Robert M. Chiles. (2022). Thick and thin food justice approaches in the evaluation of cellular agriculture. Nature Food. 3(10). 795–797. 5 indexed citations
6.
Gagnon, Mark, et al.. (2022). AgriTech investor and informant perspectives about cellular agriculture. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. 26(1). 89–110. 5 indexed citations
7.
Cameron, C. Daryl, Michael L. Lengieza, Eliana Hadjiandreou, Janet K. Swim, & Robert M. Chiles. (2022). Empathic choices for animals versus humans: the role of choice context and perceived cost. The Journal of Social Psychology. 162(1). 161–177. 7 indexed citations
8.
Chiles, Robert M., Garrett M. Broad, Mark Gagnon, et al.. (2021). Democratizing ownership and participation in the 4th Industrial Revolution: challenges and opportunities in cellular agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values. 38(4). 943–961. 58 indexed citations
9.
Sharma, Amit, Phillip M. Jolly, Robert M. Chiles, et al.. (2021). Principles of foodservice ethics: a general review. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 34(1). 135–158. 18 indexed citations
10.
Glenna, Leland, et al.. (2019). Qualitative Research Ethics in the Big-Data Era. American Behavioral Scientist. 63(5). 555–559. 5 indexed citations
11.
Chiles, Robert M., et al.. (2018). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture: Reconciling the Epistemological, Ethical, Political, and Practical Challenges. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 31(3). 341–348. 3 indexed citations
12.
Glenna, Leland, et al.. (2018). Qualitative Research Ethics in the Big Data Era. American Behavioral Scientist. 63(5). 560–583. 30 indexed citations
13.
Chiles, Robert M., et al.. (2018). Agri-food firms, universities, and corporate social responsibility: what's in the public interest?. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 35(2). 158–168. 8 indexed citations
14.
Chiles, Robert M. & John N. Coupland. (2017). Questioning Reality, Questioning Science: Teaching Students in the Food and Agricultural Sciences about Epistemological, Ethical, and Empirical Controversies. Journal of Food Science Education. 16(2). 49–53. 3 indexed citations
15.
Chiles, Robert M. & Amy Fitzgerald. (2017). Why is meat so important in Western history and culture? A genealogical critique of biophysical and political-economic explanations. Agriculture and Human Values. 35(1). 1–17. 60 indexed citations
16.
Chiles, Robert M.. (2016). Hidden in Plain Sight: How Industry, Mass Media, and Consumers’ Everyday Habits Suppress Food Controversies. Sociologia Ruralis. 57(S1). 791–815. 23 indexed citations
17.
Chiles, Robert M.. (2016). Food System Fragility and Resilience in the Aftermath of Disruption and Controversy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 29(6). 1021–1042. 2 indexed citations
18.
Chiles, Robert M.. (2013). If they come, we will build it: in vitro meat and the discursive struggle over future agrofood expectations. Agriculture and Human Values. 30(4). 511–523. 36 indexed citations
19.
Chiles, Robert M.. (2013). Intertwined ambiguities: Meat,in vitromeat, and the ideological construction of the marketplace. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 12(6). 472–482. 37 indexed citations
20.
Chiles, Robert M.. (1982). Tennyson's thanatology. Death Education. 6(1). 49–60. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026