Agriculture and Human Values

1.9k papers and 44.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Agriculture and Human Values in the last decades have received a total of 44.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Agriculture and Human Values usually cover Plant Science (865 papers), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (773 papers) and Food Science (227 papers) specifically the topics of Organic Food and Agriculture (664 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (448 papers) and Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (303 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Agriculture and Human Values are Patricia Allen, Laura B. DeLind, Philip McMichael, C. Clare Hinrichs, Julie Guthman, Gail Feenstra, Hugh Campbell, Julie Ingram, Stewart Lockie and Jeffery W. Bentley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Agriculture and Human Values

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Agriculture and Human Values. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Agriculture and Human Values.

Countries where authors publish in Agriculture and Human Values

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Agriculture and Human Values. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Agriculture and Human Values with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agriculture and Human Values more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025