Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Student Ratings of College Teaching: Reliability, Validity, and Usefulness
1971410 citationsFrank Costin, William T. Greenough et al.Review of Educational Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert J. Menges
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert J. Menges's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert J. Menges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert J. Menges more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert J. Menges
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert J. Menges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert J. Menges. The network helps show where Robert J. Menges may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert J. Menges
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert J. Menges.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert J. Menges based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert J. Menges. Robert J. Menges is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Menges, Robert J., et al.. (2016). Strengthening Professional Development. The Journal of Higher Education.1 indexed citations
Stanley, Christine A. & Robert J. Menges. (1999). Peer review of teaching : a sourcebook.46 indexed citations
4.
Menges, Robert J.. (1999). Faculty in New Jobs: A Guide to Settling In, Becoming Established, and Building Institutional Support. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series..31 indexed citations
5.
Menges, Robert J., et al.. (1997). Teaching and learning at a distance : what it takes to effectively design, deliver, and evaluate programs. New Directions for Teaching and Learning.70 indexed citations
Svinicki, Marilla D. & Robert J. Menges. (1996). Honoring exemplary teaching. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government).11 indexed citations
8.
Menges, Robert J. & Marilla D. Svinicki. (1991). Preface. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 1991(45). 3–5.6 indexed citations
Menges, Robert J.. (1986). Practical Ways to Build Student-Faculty Rapport.. Liberal education. 72(2).2 indexed citations
12.
Menges, Robert J. & Kathleen T. Brinko. (1986). Effects of Student Evaluation Feedback: A Meta-Analysis of Higher Education Research..37 indexed citations
13.
Menges, Robert J.. (1979). Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness: What Is the Proper Role for Students?.. Liberal education. 65(3).1 indexed citations
14.
Menges, Robert J.. (1979). Raising Consciousness about College Teaching: Rationale and Effects of College Classroom Vignettes.. Educational Technology archive. 19(5). 14–18.3 indexed citations
Menges, Robert J. & William C. McGaghie. (1974). Learning in Group Settings: Toward a Classification of Outcomes.. Educational Technology archive.2 indexed citations
17.
Menges, Robert J.. (1973). Assessing Readiness for Professional Practice. Occasional Paper Number One..2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.