Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Product/Consumption-Based Affective Responses and Postpurchase Processes
Countries citing papers authored by Robert A. Westbrook
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert A. Westbrook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert A. Westbrook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert A. Westbrook more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert A. Westbrook
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert A. Westbrook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert A. Westbrook. The network helps show where Robert A. Westbrook may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert A. Westbrook
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert A. Westbrook.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert A. Westbrook based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert A. Westbrook. Robert A. Westbrook is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Westbrook, Robert A.. (2002). A Case Study of Organization-Level Customer Satisfaction. The Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction & Complaining Behavior. 15. 107.1 indexed citations
9.
Epstein, Marc J. & Robert A. Westbrook. (2001). Linking Actions to Profits in Strategic Decision Making. MIT Sloan management review. 42(3). 39–49.38 indexed citations
10.
Westbrook, Robert A.. (2000). Towards a Managerial Research Agenda for Customer Satisfaction. The Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction & Complaining Behavior. 13.11 indexed citations
11.
Westbrook, Robert A.. (1997). Observations on Applied CS/D Research. The Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction & Complaining Behavior. 10.4 indexed citations
Westbrook, Robert A. & Michael D. Reilly. (1983). Value-Percept Disparity: an Alternative to the Disconfirmation of Expectations Theory of Consumer Satisfaction. ACR North American Advances.293 indexed citations
15.
Westbrook, Robert A.. (1981). Sources of consumer satisfaction with retail outlets.. Journal of Retailing.295 indexed citations
16.
Westbrook, Robert A. & Richard L. Oliver. (1981). Developing Better Measures of Consumer Satisfaction: Some Preliminary Results. ACR North American Advances.235 indexed citations
17.
Westbrook, Robert A. & Joseph A. Cote. (1980). An Exploratory Study of Non-Product-Related Influences Upon Consumer Satisfaction. ACR North American Advances.6 indexed citations
Fornell, Claes & Robert A. Westbrook. (1979). An Exploratory Study of Assertiveness, Aggressiveness, and Consumer Complaining Behavior. ACR North American Advances.75 indexed citations
20.
Westbrook, Robert A.. (1977). A Study of Consumer Dissatisfaction Before Purchase. ACR North American Advances.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.