R.L. Shewfelt

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

R.L. Shewfelt is a scholar working on Plant Science, Food Science and Animal Science and Zoology. According to data from OpenAlex, R.L. Shewfelt has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Plant Science, 6 papers in Food Science and 3 papers in Animal Science and Zoology. Recurrent topics in R.L. Shewfelt's work include Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (7 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (6 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (3 papers). R.L. Shewfelt is often cited by papers focused on Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (7 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (6 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (3 papers). R.L. Shewfelt collaborates with scholars based in United States and Türkiye. R.L. Shewfelt's co-authors include Diane M. Barrett, John C. Beaulieu, T.M.M. Malundo, John W. Scott, Elizabeth Baldwin, K.S. Tandon, B. Thomas Carr, Glenn O. Ware, R. R. EITENMILLER and Elizabeth A. Baldwin and has published in prestigious journals such as Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, Journal of Food Science and Postharvest Biology and Technology.

In The Last Decade

R.L. Shewfelt

9 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Color, Flavor, Texture, and Nutritional Quality of Fresh-... 2010 2026 2015 2020 2010 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R.L. Shewfelt United States 8 875 439 250 164 163 9 1.3k
Anne Gunson New Zealand 20 1.5k 1.7× 610 1.4× 250 1.0× 155 0.9× 168 1.0× 29 1.9k
Dimitrios Gerasopoulos Greece 22 997 1.1× 446 1.0× 369 1.5× 232 1.4× 120 0.7× 89 1.6k
S. D’Aquino Italy 21 1.1k 1.3× 363 0.8× 245 1.0× 128 0.8× 136 0.8× 83 1.5k
D. Scott Mattinson United States 20 958 1.1× 665 1.5× 303 1.2× 212 1.3× 140 0.9× 44 1.6k
Agata Mazzaglia Italy 21 624 0.7× 589 1.3× 221 0.9× 144 0.9× 230 1.4× 54 1.2k
Karen L. Bett‐Garber United States 21 709 0.8× 411 0.9× 131 0.5× 100 0.6× 432 2.7× 41 1.1k
Rinaldo Botondi Italy 22 1.3k 1.4× 642 1.5× 381 1.5× 251 1.5× 59 0.4× 67 1.6k
Elsa M. Gonçalves Portugal 16 674 0.8× 521 1.2× 389 1.6× 111 0.7× 109 0.7× 49 1.2k
Marta Abreu Portugal 17 679 0.8× 516 1.2× 394 1.6× 113 0.7× 109 0.7× 40 1.2k
Pushkar Singh Bora Brazil 19 437 0.5× 581 1.3× 134 0.5× 183 1.1× 273 1.7× 50 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by R.L. Shewfelt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.L. Shewfelt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.L. Shewfelt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.L. Shewfelt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.L. Shewfelt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.L. Shewfelt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.L. Shewfelt. The network helps show where R.L. Shewfelt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R.L. Shewfelt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R.L. Shewfelt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R.L. Shewfelt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R.L. Shewfelt. R.L. Shewfelt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Barrett, Diane M., John C. Beaulieu, & R.L. Shewfelt. (2010). Color, Flavor, Texture, and Nutritional Quality of Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables: Desirable Levels, Instrumental and Sensory Measurement, and the Effects of Processing. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 50(5). 369–389. 658 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Shewfelt, R.L., et al.. (2003). CONSUMER ACCEPTABILITY, SENSORY AND INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS OF PEANUT SOY SPREADS. Journal of Food Quality. 26(1). 27–42. 32 indexed citations
4.
Yılmaz, Emin, Elizabeth Baldwin, & R.L. Shewfelt. (2002). Enzymatic Modification of Tomato Homogenate and Its Effect on Volatile Flavor Compounds. Journal of Food Science. 67(6). 2122–2125. 8 indexed citations
5.
Malundo, T.M.M., R.L. Shewfelt, Glenn O. Ware, & Elizabeth Baldwin. (2001). Sugars and Acids Influence Flavor Properties of Mango (Mangifera indica). Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 126(1). 115–121. 85 indexed citations
6.
Malundo, T.M.M., et al.. (2001). AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR RELATING CONSUMER AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA USED TO IDENTIFY CRITICAL FLAVOR PROPERTIES OF MANGO (MANGIFERA INDICA L.)1. Journal of Sensory Studies. 16(2). 199–214. 14 indexed citations
7.
Baldwin, Elizabeth, John W. Scott, T.M.M. Malundo, et al.. (1998). Relationship between Sensory and Instrumental Analysis for Tomato Flavor. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 123(5). 906–915. 229 indexed citations
8.
Baldwin, Elizabeth, John W. Scott, T.M.M. Malundo, & R.L. Shewfelt. (1995). Instrumental and Sensory Analysis of Tomato Flavor. HortScience. 30(4). 786C–786. 3 indexed citations
9.
Malundo, T.M.M., R.L. Shewfelt, & John W. Scott. (1995). Flavor quality of fresh tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as affected by sugar and acid levels. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 6(1-2). 103–110. 215 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026