Rita Lamboglia
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Accounting top 10%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Marketing top 10%
- Information Systems
- Co-authors
- Daniela ManciniRaffaele FiorentinoEusébio ScornavaccaStefano ZaGiuseppe D’OnzaAlessandro MerendinoStefano GarzellaEnrique Bonsón Ponte
- Topics
- Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (5 papers)Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (5 papers)Environmental Sustainability in Business (4 papers)
In The Last Decade
Rita Lamboglia
18 papers receiving 257 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Strategy and Management 130
- Accounting 93
- Management Information Systems 89
- Marketing 55
- Information Systems 34
Countries citing papers authored by Rita Lamboglia
This map shows the geographic impact of Rita Lamboglia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rita Lamboglia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rita Lamboglia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rita Lamboglia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rita Lamboglia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rita Lamboglia. The network helps show where Rita Lamboglia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rita Lamboglia
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rita Lamboglia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rita Lamboglia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rita Lamboglia. Rita Lamboglia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 33 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 68 | |
| 7 | 39 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 36 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | The relationship between corporate governance characteristics and financial statement frauds: an empirical analysis of Italian listed companies | 4 |
| 20 | 3 |
About Rita Lamboglia
Rita Lamboglia is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Marketing and Management Information Systems, having authored 20 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (5 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (5 papers) and Environmental Sustainability in Business (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (89 citations), Strategy and Management (130 citations) and Accounting (93 citations). Rita Lamboglia has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Belgium and India. Frequent co-authors include Daniela Mancini, Raffaele Fiorentino, Eusébio Scornavacca, Stefano Za, Giuseppe D’Onza, Alessandro Merendino, Stefano Garzella, Enrique Bonsón Ponte, Gerrit Sarens and Francesco Paolone. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cleaner Production, Management Decision and Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.