Richard Popper

917 total citations
28 papers, 576 citations indexed

About

Richard Popper is a scholar working on Food Science, Sensory Systems and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard Popper has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 576 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Food Science, 7 papers in Sensory Systems and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Richard Popper's work include Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (10 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (7 papers) and Occupational Health and Performance (3 papers). Richard Popper is often cited by papers focused on Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (10 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (7 papers) and Occupational Health and Performance (3 papers). Richard Popper collaborates with scholars based in United States. Richard Popper's co-authors include Beverley J. Kroll, Eugene Galanter, Scott Parker, Harry T. Lawless, Christopher T. Simons, Mackenzie E. Hannum, Edward Hirsch, Herbert L. Meiselman, Gerard Smits and Colum Dunne and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance and Food Research International.

In The Last Decade

Richard Popper

28 papers receiving 542 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Richard Popper United States 13 275 132 103 95 94 28 576
Hollis Ashman Australia 14 322 1.2× 123 0.9× 56 0.5× 106 1.1× 59 0.6× 31 562
John M. Ennis United States 15 493 1.8× 280 2.1× 149 1.4× 73 0.8× 68 0.7× 44 812
Sari Mustonen Finland 12 222 0.8× 169 1.3× 59 0.6× 116 1.2× 151 1.6× 14 532
Thierry Worch Netherlands 17 504 1.8× 189 1.4× 75 0.7× 92 1.0× 63 0.7× 30 636
Sylvie Rousset France 19 209 0.8× 116 0.9× 89 0.9× 48 0.5× 207 2.2× 49 1.1k
Maria A. A. P. da Silva Brazil 9 352 1.3× 300 2.3× 75 0.7× 192 2.0× 66 0.7× 9 702
Sofie Lagast Belgium 10 436 1.6× 208 1.6× 122 1.2× 167 1.8× 75 0.8× 12 703
Jacqueline H. Beckley United States 12 236 0.9× 116 0.9× 50 0.5× 46 0.5× 66 0.7× 26 452
Jelle R. Dalenberg Netherlands 11 293 1.1× 270 2.0× 128 1.2× 229 2.4× 80 0.9× 25 661
Klaus Dürrschmid Austria 10 286 1.0× 226 1.7× 62 0.6× 96 1.0× 49 0.5× 14 479

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Popper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Popper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Popper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Popper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Popper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Popper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Popper. The network helps show where Richard Popper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Popper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Popper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Popper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Popper. Richard Popper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Souza, Vanessa Rios de, et al.. (2024). Traditional preference mapping and computational machine learning techniques: A comparative study of approaches to guide product development. Food Quality and Preference. 120. 105251–105251. 1 indexed citations
2.
Hannum, Mackenzie E., et al.. (2020). Application of the Engagement Questionnaire (EQ) to compare methodological differences in sensory and consumer testing. Food Research International. 140. 110083–110083. 8 indexed citations
3.
Hannum, Mackenzie E., et al.. (2020). Further validation of the engagement questionnaire (EQ): Do immersive technologies actually increase consumer engagement during wine evaluations?. Food Quality and Preference. 85. 103966–103966. 14 indexed citations
4.
Hannum, Mackenzie E., et al.. (2019). Does environment matter? Assessments of wine in traditional booths compared to an immersive and actual wine bar. Food Quality and Preference. 76. 100–108. 36 indexed citations
5.
Heymann, Hildegarde, et al.. (2005). Just-About-Right Scales in Consumer Research. 19 indexed citations
6.
Popper, Richard, et al.. (2005). CONDUCTING SENSORY RESEARCH WITH CHILDREN. Journal of Sensory Studies. 20(1). 75–87. 77 indexed citations
7.
Popper, Richard, et al.. (2004). Application of latent class models to food product development: a case study. 14 indexed citations
8.
Popper, Richard, et al.. (2004). The effect of attribute questions on overall liking ratings. Food Quality and Preference. 15(7-8). 853–858. 113 indexed citations
9.
Popper, Richard, et al.. (2004). When Do Attribute Ratings Affect Overall Liking Ratings. 1 indexed citations
10.
Popper, Richard & Beverley J. Kroll. (2003). Food preference and consumption among the elderly. Food technology. 57(7). 32–40. 35 indexed citations
11.
Popper, Richard, et al.. (2003). Conducting Sensory Research with Children. Food technology. 57(5). 60–65. 6 indexed citations
12.
Dunne, Colum, et al.. (1996). Shelf Life Evaluation of Bartlett Pears in Retort Pouches. Journal of Food Science. 61(6). 1297–1302. 12 indexed citations
13.
Popper, Richard, et al.. (1996). 19. Taste test vs. consumption based measures of product acceptability. Food Quality and Preference. 7(3-4). 311–311. 1 indexed citations
14.
Popper, Richard & Einar Risvik. (1993). The semantics of hedonic scales—An experimental approach. Food Quality and Preference. 4(1-2). 88–88. 1 indexed citations
15.
Lesher, Larry L., et al.. (1990). The relationship of recent and retrospective food acceptance ratings. Food Quality and Preference. 2(1). 21–27. 6 indexed citations
16.
Popper, Richard, et al.. (1988). Use of pocket computers for self-administration of cognitive tests in the field. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 20(5). 481–484. 2 indexed citations
17.
Francesconi, Ralph P., Laurie S. Lester, Lawrence E. Armstrong, et al.. (1988). Effectiveness and Acceptability of Nutrient Solutions in Enhancing Fluid Intake in the Heat. 1 indexed citations
18.
Popper, Richard, et al.. (1987). Field Evaluation of Improved MRE (Meal, Ready-to-Eat), MRE VII, and MRE IV. 1 indexed citations
19.
Askew, E. W., Marilyn A. Sharp, Shannon R. Siegel, et al.. (1987). Nutritional Status and Physical and Mental Performance of Special Operations Soldiers Consuming the Ration, Lightweight, or the Meal, Ready-to-Eat Military Field Ration during a 30-Day Field Training Exercise. 16 indexed citations
20.
Parker, Scott, et al.. (1981). Utility Function for Money Determined Using Conjoint Measurement. The American Journal of Psychology. 94(4). 563–563. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hollis Ashman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by John M. Ennis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sari Mustonen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Thierry Worch Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sylvie Rousset Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Maria A. A. P. da Silva Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sofie Lagast Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jacqueline H. Beckley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jelle R. Dalenberg Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Klaus Dürrschmid
Rankless by CCL
2026