Richard M. Luecht

2.1k total citations
45 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Richard M. Luecht is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Education and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard M. Luecht has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 9 papers in Education and 6 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in Richard M. Luecht's work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (18 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (6 papers) and Educational Technology and Assessment (6 papers). Richard M. Luecht is often cited by papers focused on Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (18 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (6 papers) and Educational Technology and Assessment (6 papers). Richard M. Luecht collaborates with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Richard M. Luecht's co-authors include Mary K. Madsen, Ronald J. Nungester, Stephen G. Sireci, Thomas J. Sweeney, Jane E. Myers, Krista Breithaupt, Sandra J. Shultz, David H. Perrin, Anh‐Dung Nguyen and Randy J. Schmitz and has published in prestigious journals such as Academic Medicine, Psychometrika and Educational and Psychological Measurement.

In The Last Decade

Richard M. Luecht

43 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Richard M. Luecht United States	18	398	274	253	190	168	45	1.3k
Brian E. Clauser United States	30	824 2.1×	296 1.1×	948 3.7×	313 1.6×	392 2.3×	110	2.7k
Richard M. Smith United States	18	306 0.8×	74 0.3×	41 0.2×	123 0.6×	171 1.0×	41	1.1k
Terry A. Ackerman United States	19	1.0k 2.5×	71 0.3×	57 0.2×	585 3.1×	321 1.9×	62	2.2k
Michael L. Nering United States	12	409 1.0×	34 0.1×	59 0.2×	215 1.1×	115 0.7×	18	901
Mark R. Raymond United States	16	193 0.5×	87 0.3×	235 0.9×	44 0.2×	139 0.8×	57	833
Ronald L. Flaugher United States	10	577 1.4×	58 0.2×	53 0.2×	218 1.1×	247 1.5×	31	1.6k
Samuel A. Livingston United States	16	495 1.2×	34 0.1×	113 0.4×	179 0.9×	322 1.9×	72	1.2k
Robert M. Pruzek United States	16	101 0.3×	122 0.4×	220 0.9×	43 0.2×	93 0.6×	39	906
Vicente Traver Spain	23	133 0.3×	315 1.1×	174 0.7×	191 1.0×	30 0.2×	90	1.6k
Vimla L. Patel United States	28	222 0.6×	720 2.6×	570 2.3×	31 0.2×	127 0.8×	64	3.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Richard M. Luecht

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard M. Luecht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard M. Luecht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard M. Luecht more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard M. Luecht

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard M. Luecht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard M. Luecht. The network helps show where Richard M. Luecht may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard M. Luecht

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard M. Luecht. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard M. Luecht based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard M. Luecht. Richard M. Luecht is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Ackerman, Terry A. & Richard M. Luecht. (2024). Still Interested in Multidimensional Item Response Theory Modeling? Here Are Some Thoughts on How to Make It Work in Practice. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice. 43(4). 93–100. 2 indexed citations

Luecht, Richard M.. (2024). Assessment Engineering in Test Design. 1 indexed citations

Luecht, Richard M. & Terry A. Ackerman. (2018). A Technical Note on IRT Simulation Studies: Dealing With Truth, Estimates, Observed Data, and Residuals. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice. 37(3). 65–76. 11 indexed citations

Luecht, Richard M.. (2013). Assessment Engineering Task Model Maps, Task Models and Templates as a New Way to Develop and Implement Test Specifications. 14(1). 1–38. 19 indexed citations

Zhan, Shu, Richard N. Henson, & Richard M. Luecht. (2013). Using Deterministic, Gated Item Response Theory Model to Detect Test Cheating due to Item Compromise. Psychometrika. 78(3). 481–497. 33 indexed citations

Luecht, Richard M. & Stephen G. Sireci. (2012). A Review of Models for Computer-Based Testing. 38 indexed citations

Luecht, Richard M. & Stephen G. Sireci. (2011). A Review of Models for Computer-Based Testing. Research Report 2011-12.. 19 indexed citations

Blue, Amy V., Sonia Crandall, George Nowacek, et al.. (2009). Assessment of matriculating medical students’ knowledge and attitudes towards professionalism. Medical Teacher. 31(10). 928–932. 31 indexed citations

Luecht, Richard M., et al.. (2006). A Testlet Assembly Design for Adaptive Multistage Tests. Applied Measurement in Education. 19(3). 189–202. 48 indexed citations

10.

Myers, Jane E., Richard M. Luecht, & Thomas J. Sweeney. (2004). The Factor Structure of Wellness: Reexamining Theoretical and Empirical Models Underlying the Wellness Evaluation of Lifestyle (WEL) and the Five-Factor Wei. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 36(4). 194–208. 55 indexed citations

11.

Luecht, Richard M.. (2003). Applications of Multidimensional Diagnostic Scoring for Certification and Licensure Tests.. Haematologica. 99(1). e5–7. 6 indexed citations

12.

Luecht, Richard M.. (2003). Exposure Control Using Adaptive Multi-Stage Item Bundles.. 9 indexed citations

13.

Luecht, Richard M. & W. Scott Burgin. (2003). Test Information Targeting Strategies for Adaptive Multistage Testing Designs.. 11 indexed citations

14.

Luecht, Richard M., et al.. (2002). A Testlet Assembly Design for the Uniform CPA Examination. 11 indexed citations

15.

Wightman, Linda F., et al.. (2000). Evaluation of the IRT Parameter Invariance Property for the MCAT.. 2 indexed citations

16.

Luecht, Richard M.. (2000). Implementing the Computer-Adaptive Sequential Testing (CAST) Framework To Mass Produce High Quality Computer-Adaptive and Mastery Tests.. 2000(1). 14 indexed citations

17.

Luecht, Richard M., et al.. (1998). TESTING THE TEST. Academic Medicine. 73(10). S51–53. 11 indexed citations

18.

Luecht, Richard M., et al.. (1998). TESTING THE TEST. Academic Medicine. 73(10). S47–50. 7 indexed citations

19.

Luecht, Richard M., André De Champlain, & Ronald J. Nungester. (1998). Maintaining Content Validity in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 3(1). 29–41. 11 indexed citations

20.

Luecht, Richard M., et al.. (1992). Item Selection Using an Average Growth Approximation of Target Information Functions. Applied Psychological Measurement. 16(1). 41–51. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact