Susan M. Case

2.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
60 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Susan M. Case is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Susan M. Case has authored 60 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 14 papers in General Health Professions and 9 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Susan M. Case's work include Innovations in Medical Education (27 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (12 papers) and Child and Adolescent Health (7 papers). Susan M. Case is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (27 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (12 papers) and Child and Adolescent Health (7 papers). Susan M. Case collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Susan M. Case's co-authors include David B. Swanson, Allan C. Wilson, G. L. Bush, James L. Patton, D R Ripkey, Mary‐Claire King, Brian E. Clauser, Michael T. Kane, Ralph F. Józefowicz and Robert M. Galbraith and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Evolution.

In The Last Decade

Susan M. Case

59 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

Rapid speciation and chromosomal evolution in mammals. 1977 2026 1993 2009 1977 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Susan M. Case United States 23 869 611 422 348 297 60 2.2k
Peter A. Cotton United Kingdom 30 58 0.1× 202 0.3× 24 0.1× 1.5k 4.3× 225 0.8× 52 3.6k
Ralf H. J. M. Kurvers Germany 27 76 0.1× 292 0.5× 108 0.3× 988 2.8× 12 0.0× 82 2.3k
Kathrin F. Stanger‐Hall United States 18 76 0.1× 382 0.6× 17 0.0× 462 1.3× 82 0.3× 27 1.4k
Brian L. Fisher United States 40 190 0.2× 3.9k 6.4× 24 0.1× 3.9k 11.3× 309 1.0× 214 6.0k
Brian R. Moore United States 29 135 0.2× 1.1k 1.7× 7 0.0× 1.6k 4.5× 454 1.5× 73 4.3k
Megan L. Head Australia 27 119 0.1× 715 1.2× 6 0.0× 1.5k 4.3× 51 0.2× 100 3.0k
Josh A. Firth United Kingdom 29 165 0.2× 343 0.6× 3 0.0× 1.0k 2.9× 28 0.1× 68 2.7k
Patricia L. Jones United States 20 97 0.1× 144 0.2× 5 0.0× 527 1.5× 114 0.4× 54 1.9k
Chad E. Brassil United States 17 112 0.1× 267 0.4× 3 0.0× 332 1.0× 60 0.2× 27 864
Helen Pearson United States 21 118 0.1× 89 0.1× 5 0.0× 17 0.0× 39 0.1× 150 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Susan M. Case

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Susan M. Case's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan M. Case with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan M. Case more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Susan M. Case

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan M. Case. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan M. Case. The network helps show where Susan M. Case may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susan M. Case

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susan M. Case. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susan M. Case based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Susan M. Case. Susan M. Case is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Albanese, Mark A. & Susan M. Case. (2015). Progress testing: critical analysis and suggested practices. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 21(1). 221–234. 39 indexed citations
2.
Elnicki, D. Michael, et al.. (2002). Improving the national board of medical examiners internal medicine subject exam for use in clerkship evaluation. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 17(6). 435–440. 22 indexed citations
3.
Józefowicz, Ralph F., Bruce M. Koeppen, Susan M. Case, et al.. (2002). The Quality of In-house Medical School Examinations. Academic Medicine. 77(2). 156–161. 137 indexed citations
4.
Swanson, David B., Susan M. Case, D R Ripkey, Brian E. Clauser, & Matthew C. Holtman. (2001). Relationships among Item Characteristics, Examine Characteristics, and Response Times on USMLE Step 1. Academic Medicine. 76(Supplement). S114–S116. 20 indexed citations
5.
Hatala, Rose & Susan M. Case. (2000). Examining the Influence of Gender on Medical Students' Decision Making. Journal of Women s Health & Gender-Based Medicine. 9(6). 617–623. 15 indexed citations
6.
Case, Susan M., et al.. (1999). Does sex make a difference? Sometimes it does and sometimes it doesnʼt. Academic Medicine. 74(10). S37–40. 3 indexed citations
7.
Swanson, David B., Brian E. Clauser, & Susan M. Case. (1999). Clinical Skills Assessment with Standardized Patients in High-Stakes Tests: A Framework for Thinking about Score Precision, Equating, and Security. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 4(1). 67–106. 54 indexed citations
8.
Luecht, Richard M., et al.. (1998). TESTING THE TEST. Academic Medicine. 73(10). S51–53. 11 indexed citations
9.
Swanson, David B. & Susan M. Case. (1997). Assessment in Basic Science Instruction: Directions for Practice and Research. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2(1). 71–84. 35 indexed citations
10.
Ripkey, D R, Susan M. Case, & David B. Swanson. (1997). Predicting performances on the NBME Surgery Subject Test and USMLE Step 2. Academic Medicine. 72(Supplement 1). S31–S33. 30 indexed citations
11.
Case, Susan M., D R Ripkey, & David B. Swanson. (1997). The effects of psychiatry clerkship timing and length on measures of performance. Academic Medicine. 72(Supplement 1). S34–S36. 28 indexed citations
13.
Gruppen, Larry D., Cyril M. Grum, R M Fincher, et al.. (1996). Multi-site reliability and validity of a diagnostic pattern-recognition knowledge-assessment instrument. Academic Medicine. 71(10). S65–7. 3 indexed citations
14.
Swanson, David B., D R Ripkey, & Susan M. Case. (1996). Relationship between achievement in basic science coursework and performance on 1994 USMLE Step 1. 1994-95 Validity Study Group for USMLE Step 1/2 Pass/Fail Standards. Academic Medicine. 71(1). S28–30. 20 indexed citations
15.
Swanson, David B., Susan M. Case, Judith Anderson Koenig, & C D Killian. (1996). Preliminary study of the accuracies of the old and new medical college admission tests for predicting performance on USMLE Step 1. Academic Medicine. 71(1). S25–7. 24 indexed citations
16.
Case, Susan M., et al.. (1996). Performance of the class of 1994 in the new era of USMLE. Academic Medicine. 71(10). S91–3. 33 indexed citations
17.
Case, Susan M., et al.. (1996). Verbosity, window dressing, and red herrings. Academic Medicine. 71(10). S28–30. 19 indexed citations
18.
Case, Susan M.. (1994). The use of imprecise terms in examination questions. Academic Medicine. 69(10). S4–6. 14 indexed citations
19.
20.
Swanson, David B., et al.. (1992). Results of the initial administrations of the NBME comprehensive Part I and Part II examinations. Academic Medicine. 67(10). S16–8. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026