Richard M. Smith

40 papers receiving 938 citations

Peers

Richard M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Management Science and Operations Research 306
  • Education 171
  • Computer Networks and Communications 123
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 122
  • Clinical Psychology 116
Replace Michael L. Nering with:
Michael L. Nering United States
Richard M. Luecht United States
Mark H. Stone United States
H. G. Osburn United States
Mark R. Raymond United States
Mary E. Lunz United States
Geofferey N. Masters Australia
Ross E. Traub Canada
David Magis Belgium
Ronald L. Flaugher United States
Richard M. Smith relative to Michael L. Nering United States Michael L. Nering's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Michael L. Nering · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard M. Smith. The network helps show where Richard M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard M. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard M. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard M. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard M. Smith. Richard M. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 20
2
Adjusted Rasch person-fit statistics.
13
3
Predicting Success for Actuarial Students in Undergraduate Mathematics Courses.
13
4
Detecting item bias with the Rasch model.
35
5 25
6 104
7 20
8 19
9 2
10 8
11 7
12 13
13 96
14 1
15 78
16
The Vocabulary Scores of Company Presidents. Technical Report 1984-1.
2
17
MATRIX LINE PRINTER MAPS.
1
18
Determining Cut-Off Scores Using Rasch Ability Estimates.
3
19 3
20 6

About Richard M. Smith

Richard M. Smith is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (14 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (7 papers) and Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (306 citations), Statistics and Probability (97 citations) and Applied Psychology (55 citations). Richard M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Everett V. Smith, George J. Klir, Phyllis Schumacher, Noel Rao, Dewleen G. Baker, Dimiter M. Dimitrov, Patricia A. Taylor, Gene A. Kramer, Mark A. Bedau and Alan Olinsky. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Educational and Psychological Measurement and Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026